Proof of Inequalities: Tips and Tricks for Checking Accuracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter phillyolly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving inequalities, specifically focusing on "if and only if" statements in mathematical proofs. Participants are examining the structure and accuracy of a proof related to these inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of proving both directions of an "if and only if" statement, with one noting a typo that affects the proof's accuracy. There is also mention of rearranging expressions to facilitate the proof of the forward direction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the proof's structure and suggesting ways to approach the forward direction. There is an acknowledgment of the reversible nature of steps in this specific proof, while also recognizing that this may not apply universally to all "if and only if" statements.

Contextual Notes

One participant references an external example to illustrate their point about the proof structure, indicating that additional resources may be beneficial for understanding the topic.

phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
 

Attachments

  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 450
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, there is a typo in the second step of your solution, you lost your epsilon on the right hand side of the inequality.

Second, this is an "if and only if" statement, which means you need to prove the forward direction (Assume |x-a|<e and show a-e < x < a+e) and the backward direction (which you did). In this case the steps are all reversible, but for ''if an only if" statements in general, you need to show both directions.
 
Following your recommendation, the only way I see the forward direction happening, is to write my expression in an opposite order.
 
phillyolly said:
Following your recommendation, the only way I see the forward direction happening, is to write my expression in an opposite order.

Right, as I said, in this proof the steps are reversible. In general for "if and only if" proofs though, this is not the case; the forward and backward direction proofs will be different.

EDIT: Check out the proof under "Example: Division" for an illustration of what I mean: http://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~larryc/proofs/proofs.ifandonlyif.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K