Proof of Parallelogram Theorem: 2 Pairs of Opposite Angles Congruent

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why two pairs of congruent opposite angles in a quadrilateral indicate that it is a parallelogram. The reasoning involves the property that the sum of the interior angles of any quadrilateral equals 360 degrees, leading to the conclusion that if two angles sum to 180 degrees, the opposite sides must be parallel. This geometric relationship confirms the parallelogram's definition. Additionally, the conversation touches on the application of Groebner basis methods for automatic theorem proving, although this aspect is considered off-topic. Overall, the proof hinges on the congruence of angles and their implications for parallelism in the shape.
macaholic
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Proof of parallelogram theorem "If 2 pairs of opposite angles congruent, then par..."

I was just wondering, why exactly does "If 2 pairs of opposite angles congruent" prove that a quadrilateral is a parallelogram? Does it have something to do with the fact that the sum of the interiors equals 360, so 2x+2y=360? I like knowing why the theorems work, so if anyone knows the proof for this I would love to see it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
if 2x+2y=360, then x+y=180. This pretty much does it, as if you draw three sides of the parallelogram, for the two angles formed to sum to 180, they must be interior angles. Hence, the opposite edges you've drawn are parallel.
 
This is a fine example for automatic theorem proving using Groebner basis methods, but I guess that is OT...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top