I Proof of the Division Algorithm

matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Application of well ordeing principle
In many books on number theory they define the well ordering principle (WOP) as:

Every non- empty subset of positive integers has a least element.

Then they use this in the proof of the division algorithm by constructing non-negative integers and applying WOP to this construction. Is it possible to apply the WOP to a subset of non-negative integers? Am I being too pedantic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can apply it to the non-negative integers, by simply observing that if the subset contains zero then zero is the least element, otherwise the subset is also a subset of the positive integers and we can apply the principle that holds for them.
 
matqkks said:
Summary: Application of well ordeing principle

In many books on number theory they define the well ordering principle (WOP) as:

Every non- empty subset of positive integers has a least element.

Then they use this in the proof of the division algorithm by constructing non-negative integers and applying WOP to this construction. Is it possible to apply the WOP to a subset of non-negative integers? Am I being too pedantic?

Yes, well ordering principle applies to any subset of ##\mathbb{Z}## that is bounded below.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and nuuskur
Thanks it is so obvious as you have suggested.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top