Proof, quadratic equation and coefficients

SpartanG345
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~toida/nerzic/content/problem_solving/problem_solving.html
example 3

========================================= Quote
Problem: Given that a, b, and c are odd integers, prove that equation ax2 + bx + c = 0 can not have a rational root.

Understanding the Problem: This is a "prove" type problem.
The hypothesis is that a, b, and c are odd integers, and the conclusion is that equation ax2 + bx + c = 0 can not have a rational root.
The hypothesis is straightforward. In the conclusion, "rational root" means a root, that is, the value of x that satisfies the equation, and that can be expressed as m/n, where m and n are integers. So the conclusion means that there is no number of the form m/n that satisfies the equation under the hypothesis.

Devising a Solution Plan: For this problem, let us try "proof by contradiction". When you are asked to prove the impossibility of an event or non-existence of certain things, this approach often is quite helpful.

Following the "proof by contradiction", let us assume that the conclusion is false, that is the equation ax2 + bx + c = 0 has a rational root m/n, where m and n are integers, when a, b, and c are odd integers. We can assume without loss of generality that m and n do not have any factors in common. Then
a(m/n)2 + b(m/n) + c = 0 . ------------------------ (1)

Let us try to derive a contradiction from this.
First let us make this equation simpler, that is, let us get rid of fractions.
Since n is not equal to 0, multiplying the both sides of (1) by n2, we get
am2 + bmn + cn2 = 0 . ------------------------ (2)

Since m is an integer, it is either even or odd. We are going to consider those cases one by one. That is "divide into cases".
Let us first consider the case when m is even.
Then n is odd, since otherwise m and n have a common factor 2. Now am2 + bmn is even, and cn2 is odd. Hence am2 + bmn + cn2 can not be 0.

Next let us consider the case when m is odd.
By an argument similar to the previous case, we can see that n is also odd.

If m and n are odd, then am2, bmn, and cn2 are all odd, since a, b, and c are odd integers. However, the sum of three odd numbers can not be equal to 0.

Thus by assuming that the conclusion is false, we have arrived at a contradiction, that is m/n does not satisfy the equation. Hence our assumption must be wrong, and therefore the conclusion is correct.

========================================================== End quote
I found this problem online, however i do not understand the last part, the one in bold. Would the last statement result in loss of generality.

Eg how would you get 3/2 this fits in the second case where m is odd. However in either case n is odd. so it is impossible to get 3/2...? If n is any even number then there can be common factors ie 9/6.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Easy way: m even -> n odd, can't be. n even -> m odd, can't be. Both odd, can't be. Both even, not allowed.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top