Proof that the n brillouin zones are of equal areas?

roya
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
proof that the "n" brillouin zones are of equal areas?

i'm trying to find a way to prove that the brillouin zones are indeed of equal areas.
if i draw, for examle, the first 3 or 4 brillouin zones of a cubic 2-dimensional lattice, then it is relatively easy to show geometrically how the parts of each of the higher order zones can be combined and put together in order to form the 1st zone. but how can i prove that this is correct for all additional zones as well, up to the nth zone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


maybe instead of proof, perhaps some suggestions on how to approach the matter in general. basically any direction or anything that could help build some intuition will be very much appreciated...
 


I think it comes from the periodicity of the crystal lattice. Think about a one-dimensional lattice of identical atoms with spacing d, for simplicity. A propagating wave is thus essentially sampled at intervals d. The spatial frequency domain spectrum is the convolution of a) the wave's Fourier spectrum with b) the Fourier transform of a series of delta functions with spacing d. But the latter is a series of delta functions spaced with spatial frequency intervals 2*pi/d. Each interval is a Brillouin zone; by definition they are identical, and all have the same "area" (linear spacing in the case of this 1D problem).

This might help in visualizing the multiple dimension case.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top