Proof with intersection of subspaces

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving properties of intersections and sums of subspaces in vector spaces. It establishes that the equation L ∩ (M + N) = (L ∩ M) + (L ∩ N) is not necessarily true, illustrated with specific spans for subspaces L, M, and N. A proof is provided for the second equation, L ∩ (M + (L ∩ N)) = (L ∩ M) + (L ∩ N), by demonstrating both inclusions. Participants clarify the need to show both directions to establish equality and emphasize the properties of subspaces. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to simplify the representation of spans for clarity.
Dafe
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose L, M, and N are subspaces of a vector space.

(a)
Show that the equation
L \cap (M+N) = (L \cap M)+(L \cap N)
is not necessarily true.

(b)
Prove that
L \cap (M+(L \cap N))=(L \cap M) + (L \cap N)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)
I let
<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> M=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,0)\}\\<br /> N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(0,1)\}\\<br /> L=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}<br /> \end{aligned}<br />

Then,

<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> M+N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,0),(0,1),(1,1)\}\\<br /> L \cap (M+N)=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}\\<br /> L \cap M=&amp;\;span\{(0,0)\}\\<br /> L \cap N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0)\}<br /> \end{aligned}<br />

and the equation is not true.

This in fact leads me to believe that the equation does not hold when L \subset (M+N), because then L \cap (M+N) = L and L \cap M and L \cap N are something else.
I would guess they turn out to be something like L-L \cap N and L-L \cap M, respectively..

(b)

L \cap M + L \cap (L \cap N) = (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)

That's all I can come up with on my own.
Any suggestions are appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (b), show that L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N) and (L \cap M) + (L \cap N) \subset L \cap (M+(L \cap N)).

For example, assume x \in L \cap (M+(L \cap N)). Then x \in M+(L \cap N), so you can write x = m + n where m \in M and n \in L \cap N. If you can show that m \in L, then you'll have that m \in (L \cap M) and consequently that x \in (L \cap M)+(L \cap N), so L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N).
 
vela said:
If you can show that m \in L, then you'll have that m \in (L \cap M) and consequently that x \in (L \cap M)+(L \cap N), so L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N).

From our assumption that x\in L \cap (M+(L\cap N)), we have that x\in L.
Since x=m+n we have that m\in L and n \in L, so
L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) \subset (L\cap M)+(L\cap N).

Is that it or do I have to show that (L\cap M)+(L\cap N)\subset L\cap (M+(L\cap N))?

Suppose x \in (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) and x=m+n where m\in (L\cap M) and n\in (L\cap N).
Then m\in L and n\in L.
I do not know how to proceed..

Thank you!
 
Dafe said:
From our assumption that x\in L \cap (M+(L\cap N)), we have that x\in L.
Since x=m+n we have that m\in L and n \in L, so
L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) \subset (L\cap M)+(L\cap N).
Wait, how do you know that m is in L from knowing x is in L? M is not necessarily contained in L, so isn't it possible that m is in M but not in L. You need to explain why m must also be in L.

Is that it or do I have to show that (L\cap M)+(L\cap N)\subset L\cap (M+(L\cap N))?
You have to show both directions to prove equality.

Suppose x \in (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) and x=m+n where m\in (L\cap M) and n\in (L\cap N).
Then m\in L and n\in L.
I do not know how to proceed..

Thank you!
You know that m \in M and n \in L\cap N, so it follows that x=m+n \in M+(L \cap N). If you can show that x is in L, you can conclude it's an element of L\cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Hint: Remember that L, M, and N are subspaces.
 
vela said:
M is not necessarily contained in L, so isn't it possible that m is in M but not in L. You need to explain why m must also be in L.
Since m+n \in L,\;n\in L and L is a subspace (closed under vector addition), we know that m \in L?

vela said:
You know that m \in M and n \in L\cap N, so it follows that x=m+n \in M+(L \cap N). If you can show that x is in L, you can conclude it's an element of L\cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Hint: Remember that L, M, and N are subspaces.

From (L \cap N) I know that n \in L, and from (L \cap M) I know that m \in L.
m+n must also be in L since it is a subspace.
Now, m+n \in (M+(L \cap N)) and m+n \in L and so x is an element of L \cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Is this any good?

Thanks!
 
Dafe said:
Since m+n \in L,\;n\in L and L is a subspace (closed under vector addition), we know that m \in L?
Yes.
From (L \cap N) I know that n \in L, and from (L \cap M) I know that m \in L.
m+n must also be in L since it is a subspace.
Now, m+n \in (M+(L \cap N)) and m+n \in L and so x is an element of L \cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Is this any good?
Perfect.
 
Thank you very much :)
 
One other thing that I didn't notice coming up in this thread.
Dafe said:
\begin{aligned}M=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,0)\}\\N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(0,1)\}\\L=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}\end{aligned}
There is no need to include (0,0) as a vector in your span{} sets. It's not incorrect to include it, but it needlessly clutters things up. You could have more simply said that
M = span{(1, 0)}
N = span{(0, 1)}
L = span{(1, 1)}
All of these are one-dimensional subspaces of R2, and for each the entire subspace is generated by scalar multiples of the given vector. Choose the scalar to be 0 for each, and you get the zero vector.
 
That makes sense and looks prettier. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K