Proof with intersection of subspaces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around properties of subspaces in vector spaces, specifically examining the relationships between intersections and sums of subspaces L, M, and N. The original poster presents two statements to prove regarding these relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to demonstrate the validity of two equations involving subspaces, questioning the conditions under which they hold. Participants explore the implications of specific examples and definitions related to vector subspaces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing suggestions and clarifications on the reasoning behind the proofs. Some participants have raised questions about the necessity of proving both directions for equality and the implications of subspace properties on the elements involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the inclusion of the zero vector in spans, with some participants suggesting simplifications in notation. Additionally, the participants are considering the implications of the definitions of subspaces and their closure properties in the context of the problem.

Dafe
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose L, M, and N are subspaces of a vector space.

(a)
Show that the equation
L \cap (M+N) = (L \cap M)+(L \cap N)
is not necessarily true.

(b)
Prove that
L \cap (M+(L \cap N))=(L \cap M) + (L \cap N)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)
I let
<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> M=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,0)\}\\<br /> N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(0,1)\}\\<br /> L=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}<br /> \end{aligned}<br />

Then,

<br /> \begin{aligned}<br /> M+N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,0),(0,1),(1,1)\}\\<br /> L \cap (M+N)=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}\\<br /> L \cap M=&amp;\;span\{(0,0)\}\\<br /> L \cap N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0)\}<br /> \end{aligned}<br />

and the equation is not true.

This in fact leads me to believe that the equation does not hold when L \subset (M+N), because then L \cap (M+N) = L and L \cap M and L \cap N are something else.
I would guess they turn out to be something like L-L \cap N and L-L \cap M, respectively..

(b)

L \cap M + L \cap (L \cap N) = (L \cap M) + (L \cap N)

That's all I can come up with on my own.
Any suggestions are appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (b), show that L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N) and (L \cap M) + (L \cap N) \subset L \cap (M+(L \cap N)).

For example, assume x \in L \cap (M+(L \cap N)). Then x \in M+(L \cap N), so you can write x = m + n where m \in M and n \in L \cap N. If you can show that m \in L, then you'll have that m \in (L \cap M) and consequently that x \in (L \cap M)+(L \cap N), so L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N).
 
vela said:
If you can show that m \in L, then you'll have that m \in (L \cap M) and consequently that x \in (L \cap M)+(L \cap N), so L \cap (M+(L \cap N))\subset (L \cap M) + (L \cap N).

From our assumption that x\in L \cap (M+(L\cap N)), we have that x\in L.
Since x=m+n we have that m\in L and n \in L, so
L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) \subset (L\cap M)+(L\cap N).

Is that it or do I have to show that (L\cap M)+(L\cap N)\subset L\cap (M+(L\cap N))?

Suppose x \in (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) and x=m+n where m\in (L\cap M) and n\in (L\cap N).
Then m\in L and n\in L.
I do not know how to proceed..

Thank you!
 
Dafe said:
From our assumption that x\in L \cap (M+(L\cap N)), we have that x\in L.
Since x=m+n we have that m\in L and n \in L, so
L \cap (M+(L\cap N)) \subset (L\cap M)+(L\cap N).
Wait, how do you know that m is in L from knowing x is in L? M is not necessarily contained in L, so isn't it possible that m is in M but not in L. You need to explain why m must also be in L.

Is that it or do I have to show that (L\cap M)+(L\cap N)\subset L\cap (M+(L\cap N))?
You have to show both directions to prove equality.

Suppose x \in (L\cap M)+(L\cap N) and x=m+n where m\in (L\cap M) and n\in (L\cap N).
Then m\in L and n\in L.
I do not know how to proceed..

Thank you!
You know that m \in M and n \in L\cap N, so it follows that x=m+n \in M+(L \cap N). If you can show that x is in L, you can conclude it's an element of L\cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Hint: Remember that L, M, and N are subspaces.
 
vela said:
M is not necessarily contained in L, so isn't it possible that m is in M but not in L. You need to explain why m must also be in L.
Since m+n \in L,\;n\in L and L is a subspace (closed under vector addition), we know that m \in L?

vela said:
You know that m \in M and n \in L\cap N, so it follows that x=m+n \in M+(L \cap N). If you can show that x is in L, you can conclude it's an element of L\cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Hint: Remember that L, M, and N are subspaces.

From (L \cap N) I know that n \in L, and from (L \cap M) I know that m \in L.
m+n must also be in L since it is a subspace.
Now, m+n \in (M+(L \cap N)) and m+n \in L and so x is an element of L \cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Is this any good?

Thanks!
 
Dafe said:
Since m+n \in L,\;n\in L and L is a subspace (closed under vector addition), we know that m \in L?
Yes.
From (L \cap N) I know that n \in L, and from (L \cap M) I know that m \in L.
m+n must also be in L since it is a subspace.
Now, m+n \in (M+(L \cap N)) and m+n \in L and so x is an element of L \cap (M+(L\cap N)).

Is this any good?
Perfect.
 
Thank you very much :)
 
One other thing that I didn't notice coming up in this thread.
Dafe said:
\begin{aligned}M=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,0)\}\\N=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(0,1)\}\\L=&amp;\;span\{(0,0),(1,1)\}\end{aligned}
There is no need to include (0,0) as a vector in your span{} sets. It's not incorrect to include it, but it needlessly clutters things up. You could have more simply said that
M = span{(1, 0)}
N = span{(0, 1)}
L = span{(1, 1)}
All of these are one-dimensional subspaces of R2, and for each the entire subspace is generated by scalar multiples of the given vector. Choose the scalar to be 0 for each, and you get the zero vector.
 
That makes sense and looks prettier. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K