Proofing Convergence of a_n = n^{1/n} to 1 - Help Needed!

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the sequence a_n = n^{1/n} converges to 1 as n approaches infinity. The original poster struggles with using definitions and concepts like lim sup and lim inf, expressing difficulty in proving that lim sup a_{n+1}/a_n ≤ 1. Suggestions include using the natural logarithm to show that ln(n)/n approaches 0, although the poster prefers to avoid exponential functions for consistency with their course material. Ultimately, the poster considers reaching out to a math assistant for further guidance on the proof without relying on these functions. The conversation highlights the challenge of proving convergence in a specific educational context.
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello, I was wondering how to proof a_n = n^{1/n} \to 1.

Doing it straight from the definition got me nowhere. But I was thinking. It is obvious that \liminf a_n \geq 1 (since otherwise for big n you could get n^(1/n) < 1 <=> n < 1). And I also have already a proof of \limsup x_n^{1/n} \leq \limsup \frac{x_{n+1}}{x_n} (which is a general result for any row x_n).

But proving \limsup \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} \leq 1 seemed to be harder than I thought.

So I'm completely stuck. Any ideas?

Thank you,
mr. vodka
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think you need to use lim sup/inf here.

n1/n=eln(n1/n)=eln(n)/n.

So you just need to show that ln(n)/n-->0. Try using l'Hopital's rule.
 
Hm, I'd like to proof it without the use of the exponential function. It's namely introduced in my Analysis course before the exp function, and it's actually used in a proof about power series, which is later used to introduce the e-function. Thanks for your help!
 
If you don't want to use exp function, how about using ln (natural log)?
ln(an) = ln(n)/n -> 0.
 
Well, we defined that as the inverse of e. Any possibilities without e (or ln)? I appreciate the help though! I find the ln/e proofs very elegant, but I hope you understand I'm going to choose for logical consistency in my course :)
 
I'm not sure that there's a way around that doesn't use exp or ln.
 
Oh... But it was left as an exercise for us in our course, so there must be. Hmmm, maybe I should contact one of the math assistants for this one then. Thank you guys for your time.
 
For those that are interested: http://myyn.org/m/article/limit-of-nth-root-of-n/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top