Proofs using absolute value with Triangle/AGM Inequality

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality |sqrt(x) - sqrt(y)| <= |sqrt(x - y)| for non-negative x and y without using calculus. The initial approach involves squaring both sides and applying the Triangle and AGM inequalities, but the user expresses confusion about handling absolute values and cases where x is greater than or less than y. A suggested method is to consider the relationship between x and y, leading to the conclusion that the proof can be simplified by recognizing that 0 ≤ x - y ≤ (sqrt(x) + sqrt(y))(sqrt(x - y)). The user appreciates the assistance as they navigate this challenging proof.
darksteel88
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


*Sorry I could not get the math symbols to work properly so I did it by hand. I hope this isn't too much trouble.

Prove:
| sqrt( x ) - sqrt( y ) | <= | sqrt ( x - y ) |

for x, y >= 0

Hint: Treat the cases x >= y and x <= y separately.

I am new to proofs and we can't use calculus. It's all confusing to me and we've only just begun. The farthest we got was to the Triangle Inequality / the AGM Inequality so I assume that's the most we can do.

Homework Equations


I assume whomever is helping me already knows the AGM and Triangle Inequalities since they're the most basic of all the inequalities for proofs.

The Attempt at a Solution


I squared both sides and moved the absolute value signs to the individual variables and then in then in either case, I can remove them.

On the left side I had x + y and just removed that and -2 sqrt(x) sqrt(y) and removed that one too. On the right I had x - y so I write it as that if x > y and -y + x if x < y

Subtract x from both sides and then

y - 2 * sqrt( x ) * sqrt( y ) <= -y

I am pretty lost here. Iff x >= y then the roots would be the same and I could replace sqrt( y ) with sqrt ( x ). I would then add y to both sides and thus

2y - 2x <= 0
2(y-x) <= 0

and that's not true since x >= y and the equality would only hold true in that situation if they were equal, which we know the equality is true if y > x from substitutionPS. Thank you for taking your time to review my question and for whatever help you provide. I appreciate it very much, this question frustrated me for far too long so far.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't really make out what you're trying to say, but this proof follows pretty easily from the inequality:

0 \leq x-y \leq (\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{y})(\sqrt{x-y})

since x \geq y (otherwise the square root of x-y wouldn't exist).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K