Propagators for time-dependent Hamiltonians

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propagators
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose I know

<br /> H \psi(x) = \left( -\frac{1}{2m} \Delta_x + V(x) \right) \psi(x) = E\psi(x).<br />

Then

<br /> \psi(x,t) = e^{-iEt}\psi(x)<br />

solves the time-dependent Schrodinger equation

<br /> \left( i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2m} \Delta_x - V(x) \right)\psi(x,t) = 0.<br />

I've done some computations, and it looks like

<br /> \Psi(x,t) = e^{-imvx}e^{-imv^2t/2}\psi(x+vt)<br />

is a solution to the time-dependent Schrodinger equation

<br /> \left( i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2m} \Delta_x - V(x+vt) \right)\Psi = 0.<br />

I have a couple of questions about this:
  1. What is going on here physically? That is, what are those two phase factors telling me?
  2. What does this mean the propagator is? When H is time-independent, U(t) = e^{-iEt}...but what is it in the time-dependent case? Is there a neat little formulation of it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
With the ansatz
\psi(t,\vec{x})=\exp(-\mathrm{i} E t) \phi_{E,\alpha}(\vec{x}),
you only get the energy-eigensolutions (stationary states) for a time-independent Hamiltonian,
\hat{H} \phi_{E,\alpha}(\vec{x})=E \phi_{E,\alpha}(\vec{x}).
Here \alpha stands for all necessary additional observables, compatible with energy, to label the possible degeneracy of the energy eigenstates.

The most general solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is then given as a superposition of energy eigensolutions
\psi(t,\vec{x})=\sum_{E,\alpha} \exp(-\mathrm{i} E t) \phi_{E,\alpha}(\vec{x}).

This is all for time-independent Hamiltonians. For time-dependent Hamiltonians, the problem is a bit more complicated. Here you get a formal solution by using the time-evolution operator for the state in the Schrödinger picture,
\hat{C}(t,t_0)=\mathcal{T}_c \exp[-\mathrm{i} \int_{t_0}^t \mathrm{d} t&#039; \hat{H}(t)],
where \mathcal{T}_c is the time-ordering operator that orders products of time-dependent operators such that the time arguments are ordered from right to left.

The exponential must be formaly expanded in terms of a power series to make sense of this time-ordering symbol. The nth-order contribution is
\hat{C}_n(t,t_0)=\frac{(-\mathrm{i})^n}{n!} \int_{t_0}^t \mathrm{d} t_1 \cdots \int_{t_0}^t \mathrm{d} t_n \mathcal{T}_c \hat{H}(t_1) \cdots \hat{H}(t_n).
Then
\hat{C}(t,t_0)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \hat{C}_n(t,t_0).

The propagator of the Schrödinger equation is then given by
U(t,\vec{x};t_0,\vec{x}&#039;)=\langle \vec{x}|\hat{C}(t,t_0)|\vec{x}&#039; \rangle,
and the solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation reads
\psi(t,\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x&#039;} U(t,\vec{x};t_0,\vec{x}&#039;) \psi(t_0,\vec{x}&#039;).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top