Proper acceleration and g-forces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter granpa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration G-forces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of proper acceleration and g-forces, particularly in the context of relativistic speeds. Participants explore the definitions, mathematical derivations, and implications of proper acceleration as experienced by objects moving close to the speed of light.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines proper acceleration as the acceleration experienced by an object, linking it to proper velocity but expresses confusion regarding its derivation.
  • Another participant suggests that understanding the derivation requires a focus on proper time rather than coordinate time, emphasizing the importance of rewriting motion descriptions accordingly.
  • A different participant raises a concern about the differentiation in a Wikipedia article, questioning the use of 'map time' instead of proper time in the context of acceleration.
  • One participant explains that proper acceleration equals coordinate acceleration in inertial frames when the object's proper-velocity is much less than the speed of light.
  • Another contribution discusses the relationship between proper velocity, coordinate velocity, and the Lorentz factor, providing a link to further reading on proper velocity.
  • One participant highlights the challenge of determining simultaneity when comparing velocities of two rockets moving at relativistic speeds.
  • Another post elaborates on the significance of proper acceleration in flat spacetime and its agreement across different reference frames, while also discussing the integration of proper acceleration over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the derivation of proper acceleration and its implications. There is no consensus on the best approach to clarify these concepts, and multiple viewpoints on the definitions and mathematical treatment remain present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of differentiating between proper time and coordinate time, as well as the implications of using different reference frames in the context of relativistic physics. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainties and challenges in fully grasping the concepts involved.

granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
proper acceleration is the acceleration actually felt/experienced by an accelerating body. the integral of this gives the proper velocity. this makes intuitive sense. but the derivation of the formula for proper acceleration doesn't make intuitive sense to me. I'm very confused about how one would determine how many g-forces were being experienced by an astronaut moving very near the speed of light.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you say you've already seen derivations and it wasn't helpful, can you please explain a bit more about your current level of understanding? It is easier to figure out where a flaw in understanding is if you explain what you do know and your confusion the best you can.

In case the problem is on the level of definitions, I'll just give a short bit here:
One things that should be kept in mind is that the derivatives you refer to are with respect to proper time of the object.

If you have the description of an object's motion according to an inertial frame, first rewrite this to be a function of proper time instead of the coordinate time. Then take the second derivative with respect to the proper time ... and that's it! If you want to know what the components look like for the astronaut, just transform your answer to the instantaneous inertial frame of the astronaut.
 
thats just it. the wikipedia article differentiated with respect to 'map time' (whatever that is) not proper time.

I guess its better to start with velocity than to jump to acceleration. if rocket A is moving at gamma=g and rocket B is moving at gamma=g+delta g (or rather g+dg) then what is the velocity of rocket B as measured by rocket A? time dilation and length contraction are easy but what about simultaneity?
 
Last edited:
The derivatives you refer are with respect to proper time of the object. Proper acceleration is the physical acceleration experienced by an object. It equals the coordinate acceleration if you are using an inertial coordinate system in flat spacetime, provided the object's proper-velocity. (momentum per unit mass) is much less than lightspeed.
-------------------
Sera

Guaranteed ROI
 
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_velocity#Unidirectional_acceleration_via_proper_velocity

(coordinate velocity v=dx/dt, proper-velocity w=dx/dτ, and Lorentz factor γ=dt/dτ)

In flat spacetime, proper-velocity is the ratio between distance traveled relative to a reference map-frame (used to define simultaneity) and proper time τ elapsed on the clocks of the traveling object. It equals the object's momentum p divided by its rest mass m, and is made up of the space-like components of the object's four-vector velocity.

In flat spacetime, proper acceleration is the three-vector acceleration experienced in the instantaneously-varying frame of an accelerated object[11]. Its magnitude α is the frame-invariant magnitude of that object's four-acceleration. Proper-acceleration is also useful from the vantage point (or spacetime slice) of an observer. Not only may observers in all frames agree on its magnitude, but it also measures the extent to which an accelerating rocket "has its pedal to the metal".
In the unidirectional case i.e. when the object's acceleration is parallel or anti-parallel to its velocity in the spacetime slice of the observer, the change in proper-velocity is the integral of proper acceleration over map-time i.e. Δw=αΔt for constant α. At low speeds this reduces to the well-known relation between coordinate velocity and coordinate acceleration times map-time, i.e. Δv=aΔt.

By grouping γ with v in the expression for relativistic momentum p, proper velocity also extends the Newtonian form of momentum as mass times velocity to high speeds without a need for relativistic mas
 
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-vector

When considering physical phenomena, differential equations arise naturally; however, when considering space and time derivatives of functions, it is unclear which reference frame these derivatives are taken with respect to. It is agreed that time derivatives are taken with respect to the proper time (τ) in the given reference frame. It is then important to find a relation between this time derivative and another time derivative (taken in another inertial reference frame). This relation is provided by the time transformation in the Lorentz transformations and is:
dtau/dt=1/gamma
where γ is the Lorentz factor. Important four-vectors in relativity theory can now be defined, such as the four-velocity of an x(tau) world line is defined by:
u=dxdt/dtdtau
The four-acceleration is given by:
du/dtau
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K