Proportion of planetary-period to the distance-from-the-sun

  • Thread starter Thread starter glassy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Kepler's law states that the square of a planet's orbital period (T^2) is proportional to the cube of its distance from the Sun (r^3). Mars, being about twice as far from the Sun as Venus, does not have a period that is simply twice as long as Venus's. The correct interpretation involves understanding the relationship: if Mars's distance is doubled, its period is not doubled, but rather increased by a factor of approximately 2.83 (the square root of 8). Clarification is needed on whether the expressions used in calculations refer to 2 * T^2 or (2T)^2, which significantly affects the outcome.
glassy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. =Homework Statement
Kepler's law of planetary motion says that the square of the period of a planet (T^2) is proportional to the cube of the distance of the planet from the Sun (r^3). Mars is about twice as far from the Sun as Venus. How does the period of Mars compare with the period of Venus?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Does this mean that the period of Mars is about twice as long as Venus'?
T^2=Kr^3
2T^2=K2r^3
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
glassy said:
1. =Homework Statement
Kepler's law of planetary motion says that the square of the period of a planet (T^2) is proportional to the cube of the distance of the planet from the Sun (r^3). Mars is about twice as far from the Sun as Venus. How does the period of Mars compare with the period of Venus?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Does this mean that the period of Mars is about twice as long as Venus'?
T^2=Kr^3
2T^2=K2r^3
?

Short answer , No.

When you write 2T^2 did you mean 2 * T^2 or did you mean (2T)^2

Similarly, your K2r^3 : K * 2 * r^3 or K * (2r)^3 or (K * 2 * r)^3
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top