Prove by Induction: \frac{1}{n^2} < \frac{1}{n(n-1)}

  • Thread starter Thread starter jersiq1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality \(\frac{1}{n^2} < \frac{1}{n(n-1)}\) using mathematical induction, starting with the base case \(P(2)\). The user correctly establishes that \(P(2)\) holds true but struggles with the inductive step for \(P(k+1)\). A suggestion is made to prove the equivalent statement \(k^2 > k(k-1)\) instead, which simplifies the process. The importance of ensuring all factors are non-negative is emphasized, particularly since the proof is valid for \(n \geq 2\). The conversation highlights the nuances of inequalities and the conditions under which they hold true.
jersiq1
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove by induction that
\frac{1}{n^2} &lt; \frac{1}{n(n-1)}

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



Let
P(n):\frac{1}{n^2} &lt; \frac{1}{n(n-1)}

Since P(1) is undefined, the base case is P(2)
P(2) = \frac{1}{2^2} &lt; \frac{1}{2(2-1)}
P(2) = \frac{1}{4} &lt; \frac{1}{2}

Therfore P(n) is true for all n>1

Inductive Step
Assume P(k) is true.

P(k):\frac{1}{k^2} &lt; \frac{1}{k(k-1)}

I know what I need my inequality to look like for k+1 I am just having problems getting there. my k+1 will look like:
P(k+1):\frac{1}{(k+1)^2} &lt; \frac{1}{(k+1)[(k+1)-1]}
after simplification:
P(k+1):\frac{1}{(k+1)^2} &lt; \frac{1}{(k+1)(k)}
So I know where I need to be. Consider this is just side work.

So for k+1 I can rewrite an expansion on the LHS as:
\frac{1}{k^2+2k+1}
And based on my inductive step the RHS of the inequality is:
\frac{1}{[k(k-1)]+2k+1}

And this is where I am hitting the block. Try as I might, I can't see any steps to take to make \frac{1}{[k(k-1)]+2k+1} equivalent to \frac{1}{(k+1)(k)}

I am worried that I may have set up my induction incorrectly though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jersiq1 said:

Homework Statement



prove by induction that
\frac{1}{n^2} &lt; \frac{1}{n(n-1)}

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



Let
P(n):\frac{1}{n^2} &lt; \frac{1}{n(n-1)}

Since P(1) is undefined, the base case is P(2)
P(2) = \frac{1}{2^2} &lt; \frac{1}{2(2-1)}
P(2) = \frac{1}{4} &lt; \frac{1}{2}

Therfore P(n) is true for all n>1
The line above isn't true. All you have done is establish that the proposition is true for your base case.
jersiq1 said:
Inductive Step
Assume P(k) is true.

P(k):\frac{1}{k^2} &lt; \frac{1}{k(k-1)}

Now here, I know where I need to go, so I am not going to write my final result out. I know what I need my inequality to look like for k+1 I am just having problems getting there. my k+1 will look like:
P(k+1):\frac{1}{(k+1)^2} &lt; \frac{1}{(k+1)[(k+1)-1]}
after simplification:
P(k+1):\frac{1}{(k+1)^2} &lt; \frac{1}{(k+1)(k)}
So I know where I need to be. Consider this is just side work.

So for k+1 I can rewrite an expansion on the LHS as:
\frac{1}{k^2+2k+1}
And based on my inductive step the RHS of the inequality is:
\frac{1}{[k(k-1)]+2k+1}

And this is where I am hitting the block. Try as I might, I can't see any steps to take to make \frac{1}{[k(k-1)]+2k+1} equivalent to \frac{1}{(k+1)(k)}

I am worried that I may have set up my induction incorrectly though.

I would approach this in a different way. 1/k^2 < 1/((k -1)k) is equivalent to k^2 > k(k - 1). We can safely assume that all factors are nonnegative. If you can prove by induction that k^2 > k(k - 1), then you will have proved the equivalent statement, the one in your problem.
 
Thanks, that does make it rather easy.
Just so I am sure I can write this correctly, the justification for equating the two identical inequalities is that k(k-1) > 0 Is that because of the base case starting with n>1 or because induction is on \mathbb{N}
 
If a < b, and both a and b are positive, then 1/a > 1/b. For your original inequality it's reasonable to assume that n > 1 (and hence positive); otherwise you would be dividing by 0 when n = 1. For your induction proof, you are proving it for all n >= 2.

Generally speaking (but with caveats) if a < b, then 1/a > 1/b. The caveat is that both a and b have to be the same sign. For example, 2 < 3 and 1/2 > 1/3. OTOH, -1 < 2, but 1/(-1) > 1/2 is not true.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top