Prove by induction that nCk is always a natural number

  • Thread starter Thread starter nietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Natural
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving by induction that the binomial coefficient \(\binom{n}{k}\) is always a natural number. Participants emphasize the importance of establishing a base case, starting with \(n=0\) and considering \(k=0\) separately. The recursive relationship \(\binom{n+1}{k} = \binom{n}{k-1} + \binom{n}{k}\) is highlighted as crucial for the proof. There is also a reminder that the proof must account for cases where \(n < k\), where \(\binom{n}{k} = 0\) by definition. Overall, the conversation reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the steps needed for a rigorous induction proof.
nietzsche
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove by induction that \binom{n}{k} is always a natural number.


Homework Equations



The problem requires that we use the fact that
\binom{n+1}{k}=\binom{n}{k-1}+\binom{n}{k}\tag{1}


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the first part of this question requires a proof of (1), which was easy enough just using
\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}

What I'm not sure of is how to perform the induction. I took the base case of n=1.
\binom{1}{0}=1
\binom{1}{1}=1

and from (1) we obtain that, with n=1, k=1,
\binom{n+1}{k}=\binom{2}{1}=1+1=2

Can I now say that \binom{n+1}{k} is always the sum of two natural numbers, and is therefore natural?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nietzsche! :smile:

I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill :redface:

to prove (7 5) is an integer, all you need is that (6 5) and (6 4) are integers …

so just be systematic in what order you do the proof

(and remember it doesn't work for k = 0, so you have to prove it for all (n 0) separately, not just for (1 0) :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi nietzsche! :smile:

I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill :redface:

to prove (7 5) is an integer, all you need is that (6 5) and (6 4) are integers …

so just be systematic in what order you do the proof

(and remember it doesn't work for k = 0, so you have to prove it for all (n 0) separately, not just for (1 0) :wink:)

I've no clue as to how to prove that (6 5) and (6 4) are integers. Do I still have to consider a base case of n=1? This question is driving me mad.
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=61891

I found this, which is the same question. According to this,

<br /> \text{Let }n=0.<br /> \text{ If }k=0,<br /> \binom{0}{0} = 1<br /> \text{ (by definition)}<br /> \text{ and if }k \not= 0,<br /> \binom{0}{k} = 0<br /> \text{ (by definition).}<br />
<br /> \text{Since}<br /> \binom{n+1}{k} = \binom{n}{k-1}+\binom{n}{k},<br /> \text{ it follows from induction that for all }<br /> n, \binom{n}{k}<br /> \text{is an integer.}<br />

Not sure if what I'm saying is valid. What do yall think?
 
Yes, if you're happy with (n k) = 0 for n < k, then that proof is correct.

But you need to specify the ordering …

Start: "It works for n = 0 and for any k, and then by induction on n … " :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Yes, if you're happy with (n k) = 0 for n < k, then that proof is correct.

But you need to specify the ordering …

Start: "It works for n = 0 and for any k, and then by induction on n … " :smile:

Thank you very much.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top