Prove Dual Space Isometry: X = C[0,1] Sup Norm

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 3K views
complexnumber
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the Banach space [tex]X = C[0,1][/tex] with the supremum norm, fix
an element [tex]g \in X[/tex] and define a map [tex]\varphi_g : X \to \mathbb{C}[/tex]
by
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> \varphi_g(h) := \int^1_0 g(t) h(t) dt, \qquad h \in X<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
Define [tex]W := \{ \varphi_g | g \in X \}[/tex].


Prove that [tex]\varphi_g \in X^*[/tex] and calculate
[tex]||\varphi_g||_{X^*}[/tex].




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The supremum norm for a function [tex]f \in C[0,1][/tex] is [tex]\displaystyle<br /> ||f|| = \sup_{x \in [0,1]} |f(x)|[/tex].

For [tex]h_1,h_2 \in X[/tex] and [tex]\lambda \in \mathbb{C}[/tex]
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> \varphi_g(h_1 + h_2) =& \int^1_0 g(t) (h_1(t) + h_2(t)) dt =<br /> \int^1_0 g(t) h_1(t) dt + \int^1_0 g(t) h_2(t) dt = \varphi_g(h_1) +<br /> \varphi_g(h_2) \\<br /> \varphi_g(\lambda h_1) =& \int^1_0 \lambda g(t) h_1(t) dt = \lambda<br /> \int^1_0 g(t) h_1(t) dt<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
So [tex]\varphi_g[/tex] is linear functional.

For any [tex]h \in X[/tex], [tex]\varphi_g[/tex] is continuous if [tex]\forall \varepsilon<br /> > 0[/tex] [tex]\exists \delta > 0[/tex] such that any [tex]h' \in X[/tex] satisfies
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> d(h,h') < \delta \implies d(\varphi_g(h), \varphi_g(h')) <<br /> \varepsilon \text{.}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
The distance function is [tex]\displaystyle d(h,h') = ||h - h'|| =<br /> \sup_{x \in [0,1]} |h(t) - h'(t)|[/tex].
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> d(\varphi_g(h), \varphi_g(h')) =& |\int^1_0 g(t) h(t) dt -<br /> \int^1_0 g(t) h'(t) dt | = |\int^1_0 g(t) h(t) - g(t) h'(t) dt | \\<br /> =& |\int^1_0 g(t) (h(t) - h'(t)) dt| \leq \int^1_0 |g(t) (h(t) - h'(t))| dt \\<br /> \leq & \int^1_0 |g(t)| |(h(t) - h'(t))| dt \leq \sup_{t \in<br /> [0,1]} |(h(t) - h'(t))| \int^1_0 |g(t)| dt \\<br /> =& d(h,h') \int^1_0 |g(t)| dt<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
For any [tex]\varepsilon > 0[/tex], we get [tex]\displaystyle d(h,h') \int^1_0<br /> |g(t)| dt < \varepsilon[/tex] when [tex]\displaystyle d(h,h') <<br /> \frac{\varepsilon}{\displaystyle \int^1_0 |g(t)| dt} = \delta[/tex].
Thus [tex]\varphi_g[/tex] is continuous. Are the above proofs correct?

The formula for [tex]||\varphi_g||_{X^*}[/tex] is
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> ||\varphi_g||_{X^*} :=& \sup \{ |\varphi_g(h)| | \norm{h} = 1<br /> \} \\<br /> =& \sup \left\{ |\int^1_0 g(t)h(t) dt| \bigg| \sup_{t \in [0,1]}<br /> |h| = 1 \right\}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
How can I find the value of this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the supremum, maybe some sort of triangle inequality application can give you a starting upper bound
 
complexnumber said:
Are the above proofs correct?
As far as I can say, they are.

complexnumber said:
The formula for [tex]||\varphi_g||_{X^*}[/tex] is
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> ||\varphi_g||_{X^*} :=& \sup \{ |\varphi_g(h)| | \norm{h} = 1<br /> \} \\<br /> =& \sup \left\{ |\int^1_0 g(t)h(t) dt| \bigg| \sup_{t \in [0,1]}<br /> |h| = 1 \right\}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
How can I find the value of this?

You have
[tex]\left|\int^1_0 g(t)h(t) dt\right| \le \int^1_0 |g(t)| |h(t)| dt \le \int^1_0 |g(t)| dt[/tex]
therefore
[tex]||\varphi_g|| \le \int^1_0 |g(t)| dt[/tex].

I think that [tex]||\varphi_g|| = \int^1_0 |g(t)| dt[/tex] holds. A naive approach to show this would be trying to approximate the step function [tex]h(t)=g(t)/|g(t)|[/tex] by continuous functions; but I guess there is a simpler solution.

BTW the same question was asked here: http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-h...tial-geometry/146627-dual-space-isometry.html
 
Is this correct?

[PLAIN]http://9ya7ng.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pFP94kdkanTL7oWHQXuecgsG7MYfNfM3fHYVt7AE01cgDtbQY8VkjQk94V8H5WceDMp8kOlh-X1WSs79GZtIUTEWTFMCBtceU/q3.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator: