Prove existence of open interval with non-zero derivative

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proof of the existence of an open interval D containing a point x0 such that the derivative f'(x) is non-zero for all x in D, given that f'(x0) is non-zero. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning related to differentiable functions and their derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in starting the proof and seeks advice, indicating a perceived simplicity to the problem.
  • Another participant questions the correctness of the problem statement, providing an example where the derivative is non-zero throughout an interval.
  • Some participants note that while derivatives of differentiable functions are not necessarily continuous, they possess the intermediate value property.
  • A participant suggests assuming the opposite of the statement to explore implications for differentiability at x0.
  • One participant proposes a counter-example function that has a non-zero derivative at a point but zero derivatives at other points arbitrarily close to that point.
  • Another participant requests a demonstration of the derivative's value using the limit definition, which is subsequently provided.
  • The discussion includes a suggestion that the original statement may be false in general, prompting a consideration of restrictions on functions for which the statement could hold true.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the original statement, with some providing counter-examples and others defending the potential for the statement to hold under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the general applicability of the statement.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption of differentiability and the potential for counter-examples that challenge the original statement. The discussion does not resolve these limitations.

meriadoc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling to get started with the proof that an open interval D containing x0 exists such that f'(x) ≠ 0 for all x∈D, given f'(x0)≠0. It seems like it should be easy but I've been scratching around for an hour now and have gotten nowhere, could anyone give me some advice to help me along?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
meriadoc said:
I'm struggling to get started with the proof that an open interval D containing x0 exists such that f'(x) ≠ 0 for all x∈D, given f'(x0)≠0. It seems like it should be easy but I've been scratching around for an hour now and have gotten nowhere, could anyone give me some advice to help me along?
I can't believe that this is the correct statement of the problem. Consider the open interval (0, 2), with x0 = 1, and f(x) = x. For all x in this interval, f'(x) ≠ 0, and f(x0) ≠ 0. Are you sure you wrote the problem correctly?

BTW, if this is a homework problem it should have been posted in the Homework & Coursework section, not here in the technical math sections.
 
While the derivative of an arbitrary differentiable function is not necessarily continuous, it can be proved that it has the "intermediate value property". That is, if f(a)= c and f(b)= d, then f takes on every value between c and d at some point between a and b.

Mark44, did you misread the problem? What you give is an example for which the "theorem" works, not a counter-example.
 
Assume the opposite. Would f be differentiable at x0?
 
HallsofIvy said:
While the derivative of an arbitrary differentiable function is not necessarily continuous, it can be proved that it has the "intermediate value property". That is, if f(a)= c and f(b)= d, then f takes on every value between c and d at some point between a and b.

Mark44, did you misread the problem? What you give is an example for which the "theorem" works, not a counter-example.
It wasn't clear to me what the OP was trying to prove (quoted below), and was trying to get some clarification.
meriadoc said:
I'm struggling to get started with the proof that an open interval D containing x0 exists such that f'(x) ≠ 0 for all x∈D, given f'(x0)≠0. It seems like it should be easy but I've been scratching around for an hour now and have gotten nowhere, could anyone give me some advice to help me along?
 
As I understand it, we are given an arbitrary function f. If f'(x0) is non-zero we are asked to prove that there is some open interval containing x0 throughout which f'(x) is non-zero. One might assume that f is everywhere differentiable.

A function f such that f(0) = 0, f'(0) = 1 and f'(x) = 0 for an infinite number of x's arbitrarily near zero would serve as a counter-example. Can you find a function like that?
 
This statement is false. Take [itex]x_0=0[/itex] Consider [itex]f(x)=x^2\sin(1/x)+x[/itex] for nonzero [itex]x[/itex] with [itex]f(0)=0[/itex]. Computation gives [itex]f'(0)=1[/itex] and [itex]f'(x)=2x\sin(1/x)-\cos(1/x)+1[/itex] for nonzero [itex]x[/itex]. Observing that [itex]f'(\frac{1}{2n\pi})=0[/itex] for integer [itex]n[/itex] shows that this [itex]f[/itex] is a counterexample since any open subset of [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] containing [itex]0[/itex] contains elements of the form [itex]\frac{1}{2n\pi}[/itex].
 
Infrared said:
Computation gives [itex]f'(0)=1[/itex]
Can you show that from the limit definition of the derivative?
 
MrAnchovy said:
Can you show that from the limit definition of the derivative?

As you wish:

[tex]f'(0)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h^2\sin(1/h)+h}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0} h\sin(1/h)+1=1[/tex]

since [itex]\lim_{h\to 0} h\sin(1/h)=0[/itex] follows from the squeeze theorem.
 
  • #10
Infrared said:
... since [itex]\lim_{h\to 0} h\sin(1/h)=0[/itex] follows from the squeeze theorem.
Yes indeed, so the original statement is in general false.

I notice the OP hasn't returned; @meridoc if you are still interested does the counterexample above suggest a restriction on functions for which the statement can be proved true?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K