Prove f(x)=g(x) - Essentials of Calculus p.45, Problem 11

  • Thread starter Thread starter razored
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two piecewise functions, f(x) and g(x), as presented in a self-study calculus book. The functions are defined over different intervals, and the original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest breaking down the proof by examining the conditions under which f(x) is defined and comparing them to g(x). There is a focus on evaluating g(x) in the same intervals as f(x) to establish equality.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the proof by considering the cases defined by f(x). The conversation reflects a mix of attempts to clarify the problem and suggestions for structuring the proof, but there is no explicit consensus on a complete solution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that this is a self-study problem, which may imply constraints on the type of assistance expected. There is also a mention of a desire for a more profound explanation, highlighting the need for clarity in understanding the proof process.

razored
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
This not homework(self-study book). I do not know where to begin to prove this. This is from "Essentials Calculus" page 45, problem # 11

[tex]f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{rcl}{-1} & \mbox{if}& -\infty < x < -1, \\ x & \mbox{if} & -1\leq x\leq1, \\1 & \mbox{if} & 1 < x <\infty ,\end{array}\right[/tex]
[tex]g(x) = \frac {1} {2} |x+1 | - \frac {1}{2}|x-1|[/tex]
Prove that [tex]f(x)\equiv g(x)[/tex]

Latex is awesome :biggrin: First time using it here!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
where's your attempt at the proof?

But consider what g(x) is for the conditions for f(x)
 
Glad you like latex. But, yes, as rock.freak667 points out, split into the three cases that define f.
 
rock.freak667 said:
where's your attempt at the proof?

But consider what g(x) is for the conditions for f(x)

Dick said:
Glad you like latex. But, yes, as rock.freak667 points out, split into the three cases that define f.

I don't understand ... "split into the three cases that define f." the cases are listed.

I have no idea where to begin to prove this; a profound explanation would be helpful.
 
He means split g(x) into the three cases that define f(x). You must show that when x < -1, g(x) = -1, when -1 < x < 1, g(x) = x, and when x > 1, g(x) = 1.
 
Consider this simpler problem:

[tex]f(x) = \begin{cases}-x & \text{if}\ x < 0 \\ \phantom{-}x & \text{if}\ x>=0 \end{cases}[/tex]

[tex]g(x) = |x|[/tex]

For [itex]x>=0[/itex], [itex]g(x)=|x|=x[/tex]. For [itex]x<0[/itex], [itex]g(x)=|x|=-x[/tex]. In both cases, [itex]g(x)=f(x)[/itex]. The functions are identical for all x.<br /> <br /> You can do the same thing with your [itex]f(x)[/itex] and [itex]g(x)[/itex]. In particular, what does [itex]g(x)[/itex] evaluate to in each of the three regions?[/itex][/itex]
 
If you want to see how to write it formally out you would do something like:
Case 1: Suppose x < -1 then g(x) = ... = f(x)
Case 2: Suppose x > 1 then g(x) = ... = f(x)
Case 3: Suppose -1<=x<=1 then g(x) = ... = f(x)

Two functions f,g are equal in an interval I if f(x)=g(x) for every x in I. (In your case your interval is all real #'s.)
 
Ok. Figured it out, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
3K