Prove $\hat{A}+\hat{B}$ Commutator $\lambda$ Complex Number Relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kcirick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relation \( e^{\mu(\hat{A}+\hat{B})} = e^{\mu\hat{A}} e^{\mu\hat{B}} e^{-\mu^2 \frac{\lambda}{2}} \) where \(\hat{A}\) and \(\hat{B}\) are operators with a commutator \([\hat{A}, \hat{B}] = \lambda\), a complex number. The user attempts to expand the exponential using power series but struggles to find a pattern. They suggest using the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff formula to rearrange terms and derive the proof. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding operator algebra and series expansions in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operator algebra in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff formula
  • Knowledge of power series expansions
  • Basic concepts of complex numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff formula in detail
  • Learn about power series expansions in the context of operators
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate applications of the exponential operator in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, mathematicians interested in operator theory, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts.

kcirick
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Question:
If [itex]\hat{A}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{B}[/itex] are two operators such that [itex]\left[\hat{A},\hat{B}\right] = \lambda[/itex], where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is a complex number, and if [itex]\mu[/itex] is a second complex number, prove that:

[tex]e^{\mu\left(\hat{A}+\hat{B}\right)}=e^{\mu\hat{A}}e^{\mu\hat{B}}e^{-\mu^{2}\frac{\lambda}{2}}[/tex]

What I have so far:
One can expand the exponential into power series:

[tex]e^{\mu\left(\hat{A}+\hat{B}\right)}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\mu\left(\hat{A}+\hat{B}\right)\right)^{n}}{n!}[/tex]

[tex]e^{\mu\hat{A}}e^{\mu\hat{B}}e^{-\mu^{2}\frac{\lambda}{2}}=\sum_{p,q,r=0}^{\infty}\frac{\mu^{p}\hat{A}^{p}}{p!}\frac{\mu^{q}\hat{B}^{q}}{q!}\frac{\left(-\frac{\mu^2}{2}\right)^{r}\left(\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}\right)^{r}}{r!}[/tex]

But I don't get any clues from expanding. So I went onto doing something different:

[tex]\left[\hat{A},\hat{B}\right]=\lambda \Rightarrow \left[\hat{A},\hat{B}\right]-\lambda=0[/tex]
[tex]\hat{A}\hat{B}=\hat{B}\hat{A}+\lambda[/tex]
[tex]\hat{B}\hat{A}=\hat{A}\hat{B}-\lambda[/tex]

[tex]\left(\hat{A}+\hat{B}\right)^{2}=\hat{A}^2+\hat{A}\hat{B}+\hat{B}\hat{A}+\hat{B}^2=\hat{A}^2+\hat{A}\hat{B}+\hat{A}\hat{B}-\lambda+\hat{B}^2=\left(\hat{A}^2+2\hat{A}\hat{B}+\hat{B}^2\right)-\lambda[/tex]

... then I proceeded to the power of 3, but I didn't get a pattern that I was hoping to get, so I don't know what I would get for power of n. Then I don't know what else to try. If any of you can help me out, It will get greatly appreciated!

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try writing out the first few terms for [itex]\mu, \mu^2, \mu^3 etc[/itex] for the sum

[tex]e^{\mu\hat{A}}e^{\mu\hat{B}}e^{-\mu^{2}\frac{\lambda}{2}}=\sum_{p,q,r=0}^{\infty}\frac{\mu^{p}\hat{A}^{p}}{p!}\frac{\mu^{q}\hat{B}^{q}}{q!}\frac{\left(-\frac{\mu^2}{2}\right)^{r}\left(\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A}\right)^{r}}{r!}[/tex]

and then rearrange. Remember that p, q, and r are all independent of each other, so you can have p=1, q=r=0 etc. I think that should work.
 
Just use the Campbel-Baker-Hausorff formula.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K