Prove , if x is a rational number , x ≠ 0 then , tan(x) is not rational

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maths Lover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if x is a non-zero rational number, then tan(x) is not rational. Lambert originally proved this theorem, and participants are seeking the proof details. A reference to Laczkovich's simplification of Lambert's proof is mentioned, which can be found on Wikipedia. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding a comprehensive proof. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical significance of the relationship between rational numbers and the tangent function.
Maths Lover
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
prove , if x is a rational number , x ≠ 0 then , tan(x) is not rational

this theorem was proved by a mathematician called Lambert ,
I search for the proof , anyone knows it ?!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Rational Number: Proving $x+\dfrac{1}{x}$ is Rational
Replies
1
Views
959
B Uncomputable Numbers and Rational Approximations
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Proving the area formula for a rectangle for all positive real numbers
Replies
10
Views
2K
I The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and Rational Numbers
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Extending the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic to the rationals
Replies
35
Views
5K
B Proof That ##\sqrt{x}## Isn't Rational (Unless ##x## is a Perfect Square)
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Proof of a fact about real numbers - transcendental and algebraic
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Understanding Algebraic Numbers & Proving Them
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Basic measurement theory question
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB We can find two irrational numbers x and y to make xy rational,true or false
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top