Prove Invertibility of I+A When A^k=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsmoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the invertibility of the matrix I + A, where A is an nxn matrix that satisfies A^k = 0 for some natural integer k. The context involves linear algebra and matrix theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the proof and notes that A itself must be non-invertible. They seek hints to progress further. Other participants suggest algebraic approaches and provide hints related to constructing an inverse and exploring specific cases, such as when A^3 = 0.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and suggestions without reaching a consensus. Some guidance has been provided regarding algebraic manipulation and the structure of the proof, but no complete solution has been presented.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on avoiding determinants and focusing on algebraic methods. The discussion includes a reference to the geometric series, indicating a potential approach to the problem.

kidsmoker
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be an nxn matrix such that A^k=0 for some natural integer k (0 is the nxn zero matrix). Show that I + A is invertible, where I is the nxn identity matrix.

Homework Equations



Invertible implies det(I+A) not equal zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know where to start with this one. I can see that A itself must be non-invertible, but I can't seem to get any more conditions on A based on that fact that A^k=0. Could anyone give me a hint please?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A hint :
[tex]I-A^k=(I+A)(I-A+A^2-A^3+...+(-A)^{k-1})[/tex]
 
kidsmoker said:
Let A be an nxn matrix such that A^k=0 for some natural integer k (0 is the nxn zero matrix). Show that I + A is invertible, where I is the nxn identity matrix.

Invertible implies det(I+A) not equal zero.

Hi kidsmoker! :smile:

Forget determinants … use algebra, and construct an inverse!

Hint: I = I - Ak :wink:

Edit: ooh, boaz … that's too near a complete solution! :wink:
 
To get you thinking, suppose [tex]A^3 = 0[/tex]. What happens when you fully multiply and collect terms for the product

[tex] (I + A) (I - A + A^2) [/tex]

Use the distributive rule for multiplication, remember that [tex]A^3 = 0[/tex]. If you make this work, you will have the idea for general case. (The pattern should remind you of the geometric series for numbers:

[tex] \frac 1 {1 + x} = 1 -x + x^2 - x^3 + \dots[/tex]

with the big difference that the matrix problem doesn't involve an infinite series.)
 
Man, some of these other people are FAST on the keyboard.
 
Okay thanks you guys, got it :p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
23K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K