Prove k Musicians in n Orchestras via Induction

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rsa58
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a combinatorial statement regarding the distribution of musicians into orchestras using mathematical induction. Participants explore the relationship between the number of musicians and orchestras, specifically focusing on the formula for different distributions of musicians across orchestras.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the problem of distributing k musicians into n orchestras with specified numbers of musicians in each orchestra, questioning the use of induction for the proof.
  • Another participant suggests looking into the symmetric group as a potential aid for understanding the problem.
  • A different participant references the multinomial distribution and its coefficients as a means to derive the answer.
  • One participant provides a detailed inductive proof, outlining the steps taken to show the assertion holds for n+1 based on its validity for n.
  • There is a concern raised about the redundancy of the inductive proof since it appears to rely on a combinatorial argument already presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of using induction versus combinatorial proofs, with some questioning the necessity of the inductive approach. There is no consensus on the best method to prove the statement.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the inductive proof seems to incorporate elements of the combinatorial proof, raising questions about the independence of the two methods.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in combinatorial mathematics, mathematical induction, and the distribution of objects in specified groups may find this discussion relevant.

rsa58
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
the question is:
let k, n, and k1, . . . , kn be given natural numbers, such that
k1 + . . . + kn = k.
Assume that k musicians shall be distributed to n orchestras such that exactly
ki musicians play in the ith orchestra. Prove that there exist exactly
k!/(k1! · · · kn!)
different distributions.

is it possible to use induction to answer this? i can prove it by using the choose function to find all the possible distributions. in that way i get a proof for the statement, but i am unable to assume that it is correct for n, and then show it is correct for n+1. can someone give me some ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please do not cross-post.
 
rsa58 said:
the question is:
let k, n, and k1, . . . , kn be given natural numbers, such that
k1 + . . . + kn = k.
Assume that k musicians shall be distributed to n orchestras such that exactly
ki musicians play in the ith orchestra. Prove that there exist exactly
k!/(k1! · · · kn!)
different distributions.

is it possible to use induction to answer this? i can prove it by using the choose function to find all the possible distributions. in that way i get a proof for the statement, but i am unable to assume that it is correct for n, and then show it is correct for n+1. can someone give me some ideas?

See something on the symmetric group, it will help i bet.
I've done the same calculus for something else.

regards.
marco
 
yeah none of that really helped, but for those who are interested in the proof using induction here it is (it seems kind of redundant since it uses the combinatorial proof within the inductive proof, but anyway):
Induction step: Assume that the assertion is true for some n with n >= 2,
and for all numbers k, k1, . . . kn, such that k1 + . . . + kn = k. Then, let
k, k1, . . . , kn+1, such that k1 + . . . + kn+1 = k. Number the orchestras
from 1 to n+1. We first ”unify” the last two orchestras - with numbers n and
n + 1 - to one orchestra, which we call O. Then distribute the musicians such
that exactly ki of them play in the ith orchestra, (i = 1, . . . , n − 1), and let
the rest (= kn + kn+1 musicians) sit in the orchstra O. By assumption, there
are exactly
D :=
k!/k1! · · · kn−1!(kn + kn+1)!
such distributions. To complete the task, we divide the orchstra O into two
parts - of size kn respectively kn+1. As we have seen in the begin of induction,
there are exactly
D0 :=
(kn + kn+1)!/kn!kn+1!
such divisions. In conclusion, there are exactly
D · D0 =
k!/(k1! · · · kn−1!kn!kn+1!)
distributions of the k musicians such that exactly ki musicians play in the ith
orchestra, (i = 1, . . . , n + 1). In other words, the assertion is true for n + 1.

is it just me or is that kind of pointless. i guess what i mean is, doesn't the combinatorial proof CONTAIN the inductive proof?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K