MHB Prove: Quadratic Inequality of Points on Semicircle O

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality $a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+abc+bcd < 4$ for points on a semicircle with diameter AE. By employing the Law of Cosines, the problem is simplified to two variables, leading to the function $f(\alpha)$, which is analyzed for critical points. The critical value is found to be approximately 1.0605, and the function is evaluated at the endpoints, confirming that $f(\alpha)<1$ for $0<\alpha<\frac{\pi}{2}$. Additionally, using the Pythagorean theorem, it is shown that the sum of squares of the segments is less than 4, thus validating the original inequality. The proof effectively demonstrates the relationship between the segments and their geometric constraints.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
AE is a diameter of a semicicle O,points B,C,D are three points on this semicicle
Given :AB=a ,BC=b ,CD=c ,DE=d ,and AE=2
please prove :
$a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+abc+bcd < 4$
View attachment 968
 

Attachments

  • semicircle.jpg
    semicircle.jpg
    13.3 KB · Views: 111
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because of the symmetry between the pairs $(a,d)$ and $(b,c)$, we may reduce the problem to one of two variables:

Prove:

$$a^2+b^2+ab^2<2$$

where $a$ and $b$ are found from the following diagram:

View attachment 971

Using the Law of Cosines, we find:

$$a^2=2-2\cos(\alpha)$$

$$b^2=2-2\cos(\beta)$$

Since $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are complementary, we now have the objective function in one variable (after dividing through by 2):

$$f(\alpha)=2-\left(\cos(\alpha)+\sin(\alpha) \right)+\sqrt{2-2\cos(\alpha)}\left(1-\sin(\alpha) \right)<1$$

Differentiating with respect to $\alpha$ and equating to zero, we may find the critical value(s) (using a numeric root-finding technique) on the relevant interval:

$$\alpha\approx1.06048703739259044748$$

Thus, checking the end-points of the interval, we find:

$$f(0)=1$$

$$f(1.06048703739259044748)\approx0.767829392509715815674068$$

$$f\left(\frac{\pi}{2} \right)=1$$

Thus, we may conclude that for $$0<\alpha<\frac{\pi}{2}$$ we must have:

$$f(\alpha)<1$$

which is what we needed to show.
 

Attachments

  • albert01.jpg
    albert01.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 102
Albert said:
AE is a diameter of a semicicle O,points B,C,D are three points on this semicicle
Given :AB=a ,BC=b ,CD=c ,DE=d ,and AE=2
please prove :
$a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+abc+bcd < 4$
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/968
connecting AC, and CE ,from law of cosine:

$AC^2=a^2+b^2-2ab\, cos B=a^2+b^2+2ab\,cos \angle AEC>a^2+b^2+abc(1)$

likewise :

$CE^2>c^2+d^2+bcd(2)$

now using pythagorean theorem (1)+(2) we have :

$AC^2+CE^2=AE^2=4>a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+abc+bcd$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top