How can the convergence of a sequence be proven using the Squeeze Law method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ak123456
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the convergence of a sequence defined recursively by X0=1 and Xn+1=1/4 (1+2/Xn) for n=0,1,2,3,4..., and finding its limit. The Squeeze Law method is suggested as a potential approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss calculating terms in the sequence to derive a non-recursive formula. Some express uncertainty about applying the Squeeze Law effectively. Others propose breaking the sequence into increasing and decreasing parts to analyze convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to understand the sequence's behavior and convergence properties. Some participants have provided detailed reasoning and calculations, while others are still exploring foundational concepts and techniques. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the sequence is not monotonic and question the implications of this on convergence. There is also mention of a lemma regarding bounds on the sequence's deviation from its limit, which is under discussion.

ak123456
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variablproves and given/known data
X0=1, Xn+1=1/4 (1+2/Xn) for n=0,1,2,3,4...
prove that this sequence converges ,and find the limit

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I though that Squeeze law might be used ,and let L=1/4(1+2/L) L=0.8437
and the sequence is not monotonic
so , how can i prove it next ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would calculate a few terms in the series to see if I could come up with a non-recursive formula for xn.
 
Mark44 said:
I would calculate a few terms in the series to see if I could come up with a non-recursive formula for xn.

but how can i apply Squeeze law.
 
First things first. Try to find a non-recursive formula for xn, and then worry about the technique to use to see if the sequence converges or not.
 
[edit] oops, made a mistake, deleting it so I can fix it
 
I'm interested how this is solved. Has anyone done it? If so, how.
 
grado said:
I'm interested how this is solved. Has anyone done it? If so, how.

I've just been having a pop at this and decided to turn it into two sequences, one increasing, one decreasing, where:

X_n+1 = 1/4 + 2/(1+2/X_n)
With X_0 = 1 or 3/4

Would it be sufficient to show that one or both of these are bounded and monotonic?
 
I think I finally found a solution, but it's ugly and hopefully someone knows a much cleaner way.

Let L be the positive solution to

L = \frac{1}{4}\left(1 + \frac{2}{L}\right)

or equivalently

4L^2 - L - 2 = 0

Thus, L \approx0.84307.

If (x_n) has a limit, then it must be L because it's easy to see that x_n is never negative.

The hard part is proving that (x_n) has a limit. I shall do this by proving that the sequence

y_n = x_n - L

has a limit of 0. To do this, I shall find a constant C < 1 such that

\left|\frac{y_{n+1}}{y_n}\right| < C

for all n.

First, I need a small lemma, namely:

|y_n| < 0.2 for all n

This will be proved inductively. Clearly it's true for n = 0, because

|y_0| = |x_0 - L| \approx |1 - 0.84307| \approx 0.15693

Now suppose that |y_n| < 0.2; we must show that this implies |y_{n+1}| < 0.2. Indeed, |y_n| < 0.2 implies that L - 0.2 < x_n < L + 0.2. Therefore,

\frac{2}{L+0.2} < \frac{2}{x_n} < \frac{2}{L-0.2}

and this means

\frac{1}{4}\left(1 + \frac{2}{L+0.2}\right) < \frac{1}{4}\left(1 + \frac{2}{x_n}\right) < \frac{1}{4}\left(1 + \frac{2}{L - 0.2}\right)

This is the same as

0.72935 < x_{n+1} < 1.0275

and we also have L - 0.2 < 0.72935 and 1.0275 < L + 0.2, so

L - 0.2 < x_{n+1} < L + 0.2

or equivalently

|y_{n+1}| < 0.2, concluding the proof of the lemma.

For the rest of the proof, we substitute x_n = y_n + L into the original recurrence relation, cross-multiply the denominator, and use the fact that 4L^2 - L - 2 = 0 to simplify the result to

4y_{n+1}y_n + 4L(y_n + y_{n+1}) = y_n

and solving for y_{n+1} we get

y_{n+1} = \frac{y_n(1 - 4L)}{4(y_n+L)}

Then, using the fact that

\frac{1}{|y_n+L|} = \frac{1}{|x_n|} = \frac{1}{x_n} < \frac{1}{L - 0.2}

we have

|y_{n+1}| = \frac{|y_n| \cdot |1 - 4L|}{4|y_n+L|} < \frac{|y_n| \cdot |1 - 4L|}{4|L - 0.2|} = |y_n| \cdot 0.92225

Thus

\frac{|y_{n+1}|}{|y_n|} < C

where C = 0.92225, concluding the proof.

It ain't pretty, but it gets the job done, unless I screwed up somewhere.

By the way, there is nothing magic about the number 0.2. At some point I concluded that I needed a number less than 0.25 but big enough to handle the variation of the sequence about its limit, and I chose 0.2 after "cheating" by plotting the sequence in Matlab.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K