Prove Surjectivity of g∘f: Homework Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Surjective
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the surjectivity of the composition of two surjective functions, f: X → Y and g: Y → Z. The proof demonstrates that for every z in Z, there exists an x in X such that g(f(x)) = z, confirming that g ∘ f is surjective. The original proof is validated, with suggestions for clearer phrasing and a more efficient approach to the argument. The conclusion is that the composition of two surjective functions is indeed surjective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surjective functions
  • Familiarity with function composition
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation (e.g., ∀, ∃)
  • Experience with proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of surjective functions in detail
  • Learn about function composition and its implications in set theory
  • Explore different proof techniques, especially in mathematical logic
  • Review examples of surjective functions in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding function properties and proof techniques in advanced mathematics.

nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Let [itex]f:X\rightarrow~Y[/itex] and [itex]g:Y\rightarrow~Z[/itex] be surjections. Show that [itex]g\circ~f[/itex] is surjective.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Proof:
Suppose f and g are surjections.
Then (1)[itex]\forall~y\in~Y \exists~x\in~X\textnormal{ st. }f(x)=y[/itex]
And (2) [itex]\forall~z\in~Z \exists~y\in~Y\textnormal{ st. }g(y)=z[/itex]

(1) guarantees that we can write any y as f(x) for some x, so placing this into (2) gives:
(3)[itex]\forall~z\in~Z \exists~x\in~X\textnormal{ st. }g(f(x))=g\circ~f=z[/itex]

And (3) shows that [itex]g\circ~f[/itex] is surjective.

Is my logic correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nicksauce said:
Proof:
Suppose f and g are surjections.
Then (1)[itex]\forall~y\in~Y \exists~x\in~X\textnormal{ st. }f(x)=y[/itex]
And (2) [itex]\forall~z\in~Z \exists~y\in~Y\textnormal{ st. }g(y)=z[/itex]

(1) guarantees that we can write any y as f(x) for some x, so placing this into (2) gives:
(3)[itex]\forall~z\in~Z \exists~x\in~X\textnormal{ st. }g(f(x))=g\circ~f=z[/itex]

And (3) shows that [itex]g\circ~f[/itex] is surjective.

Is my logic correct?

Hi nicksauce! :smile:

(have an exists: ∃ and an in/episilon: ε :smile:)

Your logic is fine …

but it would be quicker and neater to start with (2) …

given z ε Z, ∃ y ε Y st g(y) = z, so ∃ x ε X st … :wink:
 
The proof is correct but, rather than saying "for all", better wording would be "if z is in Z, then, because g is surjective, there exist y in Y such that g(y)= z. Now, since f is surjective, there exist x in X such that f(x)= y (that specific y you got before). Then [itex]g\circ f(x)= g(f(x))= g(y)= z[/itex]. That is, you have proved "if z is in Z, then there exist x in X such that [itex]g\circ f(x)= z[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K