Prove that ## 4\mid \sigma_{1}(4k+3) ##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that \( 4 \mid \sigma_{1}(4k+3) \), where \( a = 4k + 3 \) for some positive integer \( k \). The subject area includes number theory, particularly the properties of divisors and the behavior of the divisor function \( \sigma_1 \) modulo 4.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of expressing \( a \) in terms of its prime factorization and the behavior of the divisor function \( \sigma_1 \). There are attempts to analyze the congruences of \( \sigma_1 \) under modulo 4. Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the parity of the exponents in the prime factorization and the equivalence classes modulo 4.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, while others have raised critical questions about the assumptions and steps taken in the proofs presented. There is no explicit consensus yet, as differing viewpoints are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the behavior of primes modulo 4 and the implications of their powers in the context of the divisor function. There are concerns about missing intermediate steps in the proofs and the necessity of justifying certain assumptions made during the discussion.

Math100
Messages
823
Reaction score
234
Homework Statement
Prove that ## 4\mid \sigma_{1}(4k+3) ## for each positive integer ## k ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose ## a=4k+3 ## for some ## k\in\mathbb{Z^{+}} ##.
Then ## a=p_{1}^{k_{1}}p_{2}^{k_{2}}\dotsb p_{r}^{k_{r}}\implies 4k+3=p_{1}^{k_{1}}p_{2}^{k_{2}}\dotsb p_{r}^{k_{r}} ##.
Observe that ## \sigma_{1}(4k+3)=\sigma (p_{1}^{k_{1}})\sigma (p_{2}^{k_{2}})\dotsb \sigma (p_{r}^{k_{r}} ##.
Thus
\begin{align*}
&\sigma_{1} (p_{i}^{k_{i}})=1+p_{i}+p_{i}^2+\dotsb +p_{i}^{k_{i}}\\
&\equiv (1+3+3^{2}+\dotsb +3^{k_{i}})\pmod {4}\\
&\equiv (1-1+1-1+\dotsb +1-1)\pmod {4}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {4}.\\
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## 4\mid \sigma_{1}(4k+3) ## for each positive integer ## k ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think this is correct.

We have
$$
\sigma_1(a)=\sigma_1(4k+3)=\sigma_1\left(\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{k_i}\right)=\prod_{i=1}^r\dfrac{p_i^{k_i+1}-1}{p_i-1} =\prod_{i=1}^r \left(p_i^{k_i}+\ldots+p_i+1\right)
$$

If ##[a]_4## notes the equivalence class of an integer ##a \pmod{4}## then how do we know that ##\sigma_1([a]_4)=[\sigma_1(a)]_4.## It seems as if you would use this. It is wrong. E.g. ##0=\sigma_1([8]_4)\neq [\sigma_1(8)]_4=1+2+4+8=3.## I am not sure if you use it since the intermediate steps are missing.

Another point is: How do you know that the number of ##-1##s and the number of ##+1##s are equal? What if ##k_i## is even?
 
I think I know what you tried to do.

From ##a=4k+3=p_1^{k_1}\cdot\ldots\cdot p_r^{k_r}## we get
\begin{align*}
[3]_4= [p_1]_4^{k_1}\cdot\ldots\cdot [p_r]_4^{k_r}
\end{align*}
where ##m:=[n]_4## is the abbreviation of ##n \equiv m \in \{0,1,2,3\}\pmod{4}.##

Now we have to examine the right-hand side.
All ##[p_i]_4 \neq 0.## Powers of ##[p_i]_4=2## result in ##0## or ##2## so that they cannot occur since we have only ##[3]_4 ## on the left. All ##[p_i]_4=1## are of no interest since they do not change the product. From the left-hand side we know, that at least one ##[p_i]_4=3## has to occur, say it is ##p_1.## But ##[3]_4\cdot [3]_4=[1]_4## and we need a ##[3]_4.## This means that ##k_1## has to be odd, for otherwise, we would end up with ##[1]_4.## In case ##k_1## is indeed even, then there has to be another index ##j## with ##[p_j]_4=[3]_4## and ##k_j## odd. In such a case we would choose ##j## as our first prime. Say ##k_1=2l_1+1.##

Therefore, we can assume that ##[p_1^{k_1}]_4=[3]_4^{2l_1+1}##. Now
\begin{align*}
\sigma_1([a]_4)&\equiv \prod_{i=1}^r \sigma_1([p_i]_4)^{k_i} \equiv \sigma_1([3^{2l_1+1}]_4) \prod_{i=2}^r \sigma_1([p_i]_4)^{k_i}\\
&\equiv \dfrac{3^{2l_1+2}-1}{3-1}\prod_{i=^2}^r \sigma_1([p_i]_4)^{k_i} \\
&\equiv \dfrac{9^m-1}{2}\prod_{i=^2}^r \sigma_1([p_i]_4)^{k_i} \\
&\equiv 0\pmod{4}
\end{align*}

with ##m=l_1+1\geq 1## and ##9^m-1 \equiv 0\pmod{8},## hence ##\dfrac{9^m-1}{2}\equiv 0\pmod{4}.##

You have to explain why you may assume ##p_1=3,## which by the way is wrong. We can only assume that ##[p_1]_4\equiv [3]_4.##

And make sure that you first pass the entire formula modulo four, and then apply ##\sigma_1.##
 
Last edited:
The most important question when I read a proof, and therefore the most important question when you write a proof, is WHY. I ask this from line to line. If anybody is asking you this, you should be able to answer. In the best case, it is already written in the proof.
 
Okay, so I revised this proof:

Let ## 4k+3=p_{1}^{k_1}p_{2}^{k_2}\dotsb p_{s}^{k_s} ##.
Then ## 4\equiv 0\pmod {4} ## and ## 4k+3\equiv 3\pmod {4} ##.
Thus ## p_{i}^{k_{i}}\not\equiv 0\pmod {4} ## for ## i=1, 2,..., s ##.
Suppose all ## p_{i}^{k_{i}}\equiv 1\pmod {4} ##.
Then ## p_{1}^{k_{1}}p_{2}^{k_{2}}\dotsb p_{s}^{k_{s}}\equiv 1\pmod {4} ##.
Since ## p_{1}^{k_{1}}p_{2}^{k_{2}}\dotsb p_{s}^{k_{s}}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ##,
it follows that ## \exists ## one ## p_{i} ## satisfying ## p_{i}^{k_{i}}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ##.
This means ## p_{i}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ##.
Observe that ## p_{i}^{2}\equiv 9\equiv 1\pmod {4} ## and ## p_{i}^{3}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ##.
If ## p_{i}^{r}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ##, then ## r ## must be odd.
This implies ## p_{i}^{k_{i}}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ## where ## k_{i} ## is odd.
Now we have
\begin{align*}
&\sigma_{1}(p_{i}^{k_{i}})=p_{i}^{k_{i}}+p_{i}^{k_{i}-1}+\dotsb +p_{i}+1\\
&\equiv (3+1+\dotsb +3+1)\pmod {4}\\
&\equiv 0\pmod {4},\\
\end{align*}
because ## p_{i}^{r}\equiv 3\pmod {4} ## if ## r ## is odd and ## p_{i}^{r}\equiv 1\pmod {4} ## if ## r ## is even.
Thus
\begin{align*}
4\mid \sigma_{1}(p_{i}^{k_{i}} ) & \implies 4\mid \sigma (p_{1}^{k_{1}} )\dotsb \sigma_{1} (p_{i}^{k_{i}})\dotsb \sigma_{1} ( p_{s}^{k_{s}} ) \\
&\implies4\mid \sigma_{1} (p_{1}^{k_{1}}p_{2}^{k_{2}}\dotsb p_{s}^{k_{s}}).\\
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## 4\mid \sigma_{1} (4k+3) ## for each positive integer ## k ##.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Correct.

I edited the typos. If you add one # too many or set one bracket wrong, then it doesn't render properly. It's sometimes hard to find if formulas got lengthy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K