Prove that if m, n are natural, then the root

  • Thread starter Thread starter rangerjoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural Root
rangerjoe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've encountered this exercise which I'm having a hard time proving. It goes like this:
Prove that if m and n are natural, then the nth root of m is either integer or irrational.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would imagine you would start by proving it for m= p, a prime number. That would make it easy to prove "If integer k is not divisible by p then neither is kn" so you could mimic Euclid's proof that \sqrt{2} is irrational.

After that, look at products of prime.
 
if p is prime and divides m^n, p must divide m...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top