Prove that none of them is prime

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmeado07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the numbers [n factorial + 2], [n factorial + 3], ..., [n factorial + n] are not prime for natural numbers n ≥ 2. Participants suggest that each of these numbers has a factor corresponding to its additive component, such as 2 for n! + 2 and 3 for n! + 3, indicating that none can be prime. This leads to the conclusion that there are arbitrarily long stretches of consecutive non-prime numbers in the natural numbers, specifically n - 1 consecutive non-primes starting from n! + 2. The conversation also touches on how to find large sequences of non-prime numbers, with participants attempting to clarify the relationship between n and the number of consecutive non-primes. Overall, the thread emphasizes the connection between factorials and the distribution of prime numbers.
kmeado07
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let n be a part of the natural numbers, with n>=2. Consider the numbers [n factorial +2 ], [n factorial + 3], ..., [n factorial + n].
Prove that none of them is prime, and deduce that there are arbitrarily long finite stretches of consecutive non-prime nummbers in the natural numbers.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know how to do this question. Any help/hints would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kmeado07 said:
Let n be a part of the natural numbers, with n>=2. Consider the numbers [n factorial +2 ], [n factorial + 3], ..., [n factorial + n].
Prove that none of them is prime, and deduce that there are arbitrarily long finite stretches of consecutive non-prime nummbers in the natural numbers.

Hi kmeado07! :smile:

Hint: what factor is there of (n! + 3)? :wink:
 


Is (n factorial + 2) a factor of it?

Which would then apply to the others, which would show that none of them were prime.
For them each to be prime, their only factors would have to be themselves and 1.
 
Hi kmeado07! :smile:

(please use the !)
kmeado07 said:
Is (n factorial + 2) a factor of it?

No: n! + 2 is only one less than n! + 3 …

how can it be a factor of it?

Try writing n! + 3 in full (with n = 7, say) :smile:
 


ok, so a factor of n!+3 is 3, and a factor of n!+2 is 2 and so on.
So a factor of n!+n is n. This shows that none of them is prime.

How would i go about doing the second part of the question?
 
kmeado07 said:
Prove that none of them is prime, and deduce that there are arbitrarily long finite stretches of consecutive non-prime nummbers in the natural numbers.
kmeado07 said:
ok, so a factor of n!+3 is 3, and a factor of n!+2 is 2 and so on.
So a factor of n!+n is n. This shows that none of them is prime.

How would i go about doing the second part of the question?

ok, so how many consecutive non-prime numbers are there starting with n!?
 


So there are n-2 consecutive non-primes starting with n! ?
 
kmeado07 said:
So there are n-2 consecutive non-primes starting with n! ?

ooh, i got that slightly wrong, didn't i? :redface:

yes, n-1 starting with n! + 2 …

so if you wanted 1,000,000 consecutive non-primes, where would you start? :smile:
 


you would start at n! + 1,000,003 ?
 
  • #10
kmeado07 said:
you would start at n! + 1,000,003 ?

Nowhere near …

try again :smile:
 
  • #11


i don't know, I am confused!
 
  • #12


bump i'd like more info on this too
 
  • #13


kmeado07 said:
So there are n-2 consecutive non-primes starting with n! ?

tiny-tim said:
so if you wanted 1,000,000 consecutive non-primes, where would you start? :smile:

kmeado07 said:
you would start at n! + 1,000,003 ?
If n- 2= 1,000,000, what is n? It's that easy.
 
  • #14


tiny-tim said:
ooh, i got that slightly wrong, didn't i? :redface:

yes, n-1 starting with n! + 2 …

so if you wanted 1,000,000 consecutive non-primes, where would you start? :smile:

I really have no idea what's going on starting with this

are you saying for n=10, then

2 + 10*9*8*...*2*1

has n-1 = 9 consectuve non primes?

because I don't see that, maybe I am not understanding the question..
 
  • #15


Which numbers from 2 to 10 fails to divide 10! ? Given that, what divides 10! + 2? 10! + 3, and so on?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
893
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K