Prove that Sym(F) is a subgroup of O2(R)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasperrepsak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that Sym(F) is a subgroup of O2(R) for a non-empty bounded subset F of R². Key steps include establishing a point a in R² such that all transformations φ in Sym(F) fix a, and using this point as the origin. The injectivity of the mapping L: Sym(F) → O2(R) must be demonstrated, along with showing that non-trivial transformations in Sym(F) have unique fixed points and that Sym(F) is commutative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically subgroups and injective mappings.
  • Familiarity with the properties of bounded sets in R².
  • Knowledge of the orthogonal group O2(R) and its significance in linear transformations.
  • Basic principles of fixed points in transformations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the orthogonal group O2(R) in detail.
  • Learn about fixed point theorems and their applications in group theory.
  • Explore injective functions and their implications in algebraic structures.
  • Review the concept of commutativity in groups and its relevance to Sym(F).
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of Abstract Algebra, mathematicians interested in group theory, and anyone tackling advanced problems involving symmetry in bounded sets.

kasperrepsak
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\textbf{26.} Let F \subset \textbf{R$^2$} be a non-empty subset of \textbf{R$^2$} that is bounded. Prove that after chosing appropriate coordinates Sym(F) is a subgroup of <br /> O_2(\textbf{R}).

Homework Equations


The hints given are:
Prove there is an a\in \textbf{R$^2$} so that for all φ in Sym(F), φ(a)=a, and use that a as the origin.
Show that the mapping L: Sym(F)--> O_2(\textbf{R}) is injective, that all non trivial φ in Sym(F)^+ have a unique fixed point a_φ, and that Sym(F)^+ is commutative.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have recently started Abstract Algebra and this problem is supposably very difficult to prove. I know that since it is a bounded set there can't be a translational-symmetry like there could be for an infinite line. I'm not sure yet how to prove that, and if it is needed to prove the problem. Any help would be very welcome.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could someone please help me on my way? It is a homework assignment for tomorrow : D.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K