MHB Prove that the expression is divisible by 26460

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The expression $27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8$ needs to be proven divisible by $26460$, which factors into $2^2 \cdot 3^3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7^2$. The discussion emphasizes that demonstrating divisibility by each factor separately is a viable approach. For instance, since $27195$ is a multiple of $5$, and the combination of the other two terms also results in a multiple of $5$, the expression is shown to be divisible by $5$. Similar reasoning applies to the other factors, using properties of powers and modular arithmetic. Ultimately, the consensus is that the problem can be solved using elementary methods, confirming the divisibility by $26460$.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Problem:
Prove that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is divisible by $26460$.

Attempt:
I grouped the last two terms and manipulated them algebraically and came to the point where I suspect I might have taken the wrong path...here is the last step where I stopped and don't know how to proceed.

$\dfrac{27195^8-10887^8+10152^8}{26460}=\dfrac{3^5\cdot5^7\cdot7^{14}\cdot37^8-7013(2^6\cdot3^6\cdot47^2+3^2\cdot19^2\cdot191^2)(10152^4+10887^4)}{8}$

I'd like to ask, do you think this problem can be solved using only elementary methods?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Problem:
Prove that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is divisible by $26460$.

Attempt:
I grouped the last two terms and manipulated them algebraically and came to the point where I suspect I might have taken the wrong path...here is the last step where I stopped and don't know how to proceed.

$\dfrac{27195^8-10887^8+10152^8}{26460}=\dfrac{3^5\cdot5^7\cdot7^{14}\cdot37^8-7013(2^6\cdot3^6\cdot47^2+3^2\cdot19^2\cdot191^2)(10152^4+10887^4)}{8}$

I'd like to ask, do you think this problem can be solved using only elementary methods?

Thanks in advance.
The best way to make the calculation more manageable is to factorise $26460 = 2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5\cdot 7^2$. If you can separately show that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is divisible by each of the numbers $2^2$, $3^3$, $5$ and $7^2$, then the result will follow.

Take the factor 5, for example. Since $27195$ is a multiple of $5$, so is its eighth power. The other two terms are not multiples of $5$, but here you need to use your idea of grouping those two terms together. In fact, $a^8-b^8$ is a multiple of $a-b$. So $10887^8+10152^8$ is a multiple of $10887-10152 = 735$. That is a multiple of $5$. Putting those results together, you see that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is a multiple of $5$.

The exact same procedure shows that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is a multiple of $7^2$. You can use similar ideas to show that it is also a multiple of $3^3$ and of $2^2$. (To deal with $3^3$, notice that $a^8-b^8$ is also a multiple of $a+b$.)
 
Opalg said:
The best way to make the calculation more manageable is to factorise $26460 = 2^2\cdot 3^3\cdot 5\cdot 7^2$. If you can separately show that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is divisible by each of the numbers $2^2$, $3^3$, $5$ and $7^2$, then the result will follow.

Take the factor 5, for example. Since $27195$ is a multiple of $5$, so is its eighth power. The other two terms are not multiples of $5$, but here you need to use your idea of grouping those two terms together. In fact, $a^8-b^8$ is a multiple of $a-b$. So $10887^8+10152^8$ is a multiple of $10887-10152 = 735$. That is a multiple of $5$. Putting those results together, you see that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is a multiple of $5$.

The exact same procedure shows that $27195^8-10887^8+10152^8$ is a multiple of $7^2$. You can use similar ideas to show that it is also a multiple of $3^3$ and of $2^2$. (To deal with $3^3$, notice that $a^8-b^8$ is also a multiple of $a+b$.)

Awesome!:cool: I finally understand it now!

Thanks for your help, Opalg!
 
Opalg's answer is very good! A more "heavy machinery" method could also go as follows:

$$26460 = 2^2 \cdot 3^3 \cdot 5^1 \cdot 7^2$$
And we can do the following reductions with a couple modulo operations:

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 3^8 - 3^8 + 0^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{2^2}$$

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 6^8 - 6^8 + 0^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{3^3}$$

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 2^8 + 2^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{5^1}$$

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 9^8 + 9^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{7^2}$$
And invoking the CRT (since $2^2$, $3^3$, $5^1$, $7^2$ are pairwise coprime):

$$\mathbb{Z}_{26460} = \mathbb{Z}_{2^2} \times \mathbb{Z}_{3^3} \times \mathbb{Z}_{5^1} \times \mathbb{Z}_{7^2}$$
$$\therefore$$
$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{26460}$$
This also shows that the exponent (8) is in fact irrelevant, and could be anything.

EDIT: fixed, see ILikeSerena's post below.
 
Last edited:
Bacterius said:
Opalg's answer is very good! A more "heavy machinery" method could also go as follows:

$$26460 = 2^2 \cdot 3^3 \cdot 5^1 \cdot 7^2$$
And we can do the following reductions with a couple modulo operations:

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 0^8 + 0^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{2}$$

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 0^8 + 0^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{3}$$

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 2^8 + 2^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{5}$$

$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 2^8 + 2^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{7}$$
And invoking the CRT (since 2, 3, 5, 7 are pairwise coprime):

$$\mathbb{Z}_{26460} = \mathbb{Z}_{2^2} \times \mathbb{Z}_{3^3} \times \mathbb{Z}_{5^1} \times \mathbb{Z}_{7^2}$$
$$\therefore$$
$$27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{26460}$$
This also shows that the exponent (8) is in fact irrelevant, and could be anything.

I'm afraid that the number $2 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7$ is also zero mod 2, mod 3, mod 5, and mod 7.
But it is not divisible by 26460.

For CRT you need to show the mod relation for $2^2$, $3^3$, $5^1$, and $7^2$.

For instance for $3^3$, we need:

$\hspace{0.5 in}27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 0^8 + 0^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{3^3}$

Still quite doable.
 
ILikeSerena said:
I'm afraid that the number $2 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7$ is also zero mod 2, mod 3, mod 5, and mod 7.
But it is not divisible by 26460.

For CRT you need to show the mod relation for $2^2$, $3^3$, $5^1$, and $7^2$.

For instance for $3^3$, we need:

$\hspace{0.5 in}27195^8 - 10887^8 + 10152^8 \equiv 0^8 - 0^8 + 0^8 \equiv 0 \pmod{3^3}$

Still quite doable.

True, my mistake. Though it's not too difficult to check, just do the same operations but using 4, 27 and 49... (which still work out, it's clear the integers in the problem were carefully chosen to cancel each other out)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top