Prove: the biggest that N choose k gets is at k = N/2 for N even

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Is there a simple way to prove this? I tried to use induction, but you get down to some horrible fraction (letting N = 2m for some m) in the inductive step:

<br /> \begin{pmatrix} 2(m+1) \\ k \end{pmatrix} = \frac{(2m)!}{k!(2m - k)!} \cdot \frac{(2m+2)(2m+1)}{(2m+2-k)(2m+1-k)}<br />

The inductive hypothesis is to assume the thing on the left is biggest for k = m, but the second fraction gets bigger as you make k bigger. So...what to do! Any comments? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to prove this: If ##k<k^\prime\leq N/2##, then

\binom{N}{k} &lt; \binom{N}{k^\prime}

And if ##N/2\leq k^\prime<k##, then

\binom{N}{k} &lt; \binom{N}{k^\prime}

To prove these two statements, it suffices to look at ##k## and ##k+1##.
 
Note that it suffices to show that k!(2m-k)! attains its minimum at k=m (0≤k≤2m), and this is equivalent to showing that
(m-r)!(m+r)! attains its minimum at r=0 (0≤r≤m).
 
AxiomOfChoice said:
Is there a simple way to prove this?

let n=even, k<=n/2
<br /> \begin{pmatrix} n \\ k \end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix} n \\ k-1 \end{pmatrix} *{ (n-k+1)/(k)}<br />

then (n-k+1)/k > (n/2 +1)/k >1

QED

...the symmetry between k and n-k finishes the proof.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top