Prove the sum of two subspaces is also a subspace.

PhillipKP
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi I'm trying to prove that the sum of two subspaces [tex]U[/tex] and [tex]W[/tex] is also a subspace.

Homework Equations



[tex]U[/tex] is a subspace of [tex]V[/tex] if [tex]U[/tex] is also a vector space and it contains the additive identity, is closed under addition, and closed under scalar multiplication.

The definition of a sum a vector subspace U and W is
[tex]U+W=\{u+w:\, u\in U,w\in W\}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Since [tex]U[/tex] and [tex]W[/tex] both contain the additive identity, [tex]U+W[/tex] contains the additive identity
3. Since both [tex]U[/tex] and [tex]W[/tex] are closed under scalar multiplication, any combination of [tex]u+w[/tex] is closed under scalar multiplication since multiplication is distributive, associative and commutes (assuming were dealing with the reals here). I'm having a hard time thinking about how to justify that U+W is closed under addition.

Also is my justification for closure under scalar multiplication right?
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
First let Z = U+W

to show its closed under addition
so take z, z' in Z then show z + z' is an element of Z

your words are close, but I would try a similar thiong for the scalar multiplication to be a little more explicit
 
[tex]U+W=\{u+w:\, u\in U,w\in W\}[/tex]

Writing this means that: U + W is the set of the sum of all possible 2 vectors, of which one is taken out from U, and the other from W, i.e:
  • If u is some vector of U, and w is some vector of W, then [itex]u + w \in U + W[/itex]. (1)
  • And if v is some vector of U + W, then it can be split into the sum of 2 vectors, one in U, and one in W. That is: [tex]v \in U + W \Rightarrow \exists u \in U, w \in W : v = u + w[/itex] <b>(2)</b>.[/tex]
[tex] <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="PhillipKP" data-source="post: 2337030" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-title"> PhillipKP said: </div> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> <br /> 1. Since [tex]U[/tex] and [tex]W[/tex] both contain the additive identity, [tex]U+W[/tex] contains the additive identity </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> Ok, this is good, but you really need to <b>show</b> why it contains the additive identity, instead of just reasoning like that. You can go like this:<br /> <br /> Since U, and W are subspaces, that means:<br /> <br /> [tex]\left\{ \begin{array}{c} 0 \in U \\ 0 \in W \end{array} \right. \Rightarrow 0 = 0 + 0 \in U + V[/tex] <u>(due to <b>(1)</b>)</u> (the underline part is just for you to understand why)<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> 3. Since both [tex]U[/tex] and [tex]W[/tex] are closed under scalar multiplication, any combination of [tex]u+w[/tex] is closed under scalar multiplication since multiplication is distributive, associative and commutes (assuming were dealing with the reals here). </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> As I said above, you should make this part clearer.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> I'm having a hard time thinking about how to justify that U+W is closed under addition. </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> Just start out as normal. So, what you want is to prove that:<br /> <br /> [tex]\forall v_1 \in U + W, v_2 \in U + W[/tex], we must have [tex]v_1 + v_2 \in U + W[/tex]<br /> <br /> Hint: Use <b>(2)</b>, and the fact that both U, and W are already subspaces. :)<br /> <br /> The same proof goes for "<i>closed under scalar multiplication</i>".[/tex]
 
Ok thank you. Let me think about this some and try to make some progress. I'll be back later in the day.
 
OK I think I got it. Thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K