Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Prove to myself that rotation is a linear transformation?

  1. Jan 25, 2015 #1
    How do you prove that rotation of a vector is a linear transformation?

    It's intuitive (although not completely crystal clear to me) that it is a linear transformation at the 2d level, but how do I prove it to myself (that this is a general property of rotations)?

    For example, rotate vector ##\vec{V}## in the xy plane by 30º. ##Rot(\vec{V})=Rot(Vx \vec{e1} + Vy \vec{e2} + Vz \vec{e3})= Vx Rot(\vec{e1}) +Vy Rot(\vec{e2}) + Vz Rot(\vec{e3}) ##

    Or in other words, if I have to rotate a vector on the plane xy (for example), how do I prove that this rotation can be done by rotating only my base vectors (or my axis, if you will) and then drawing my original vector with that "new" base or coordinate axis.

    Thanks.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2015
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 25, 2015 #2

    Stephen Tashi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    What is your definition of a rotation?

    To prove something, you'd have to begin with a precise definition of a rotation. If you take an intuitive idea of a rotation as your starting point, you can't do anything except make an intuitive argument.
     
  4. Jan 25, 2015 #3
    I think what my class means by rotating a vector is the following: Draw a coordinate axis. Draw a position vector in the traditional way (as an arrow). If I say rotate a vector 30º in the xy plane then this means to trail an arclength equivalent to 30º with the head of your arrow keeping the tail fixed on the origin.

    Is this a good conception of what it means to rotate a vector in 3d?

    If it's worth mentioning, this is a mathematical physics class, so maybe you have a more precise idea of what they mean by "vector rotation".

    Thanks.
     
  5. Jan 25, 2015 #4
    What's the rigorous definition, by the way?
     
  6. Jan 25, 2015 #5

    Stephen Tashi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    One way to state a rigorous definition of a 2-D counterclockwise rotation by angle theta about the origin (0,0) is to give the equations that specify the image of point (x,y). The rotation is a function R(x,y,theta) gives a 2-D vector R(x,y,theta) = ( f(x,y, theta), g(x,y,theta) ). What functions would f and g be?

    If you know about matrices, look at the Wikipedia article on rotation matrix: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation_matrix That will tell you the formulas for f and g.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Prove to myself that rotation is a linear transformation?
  1. Linear transformation (Replies: 9)

Loading...