Prove Z can be partitioned into 3 parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter gotmilk04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    parts
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the set of integers Z can be partitioned into three distinct subsets based on the remainders when integers are divided by 3. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the proof, indicating a connection to the concept of remainders.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possible remainders when integers are divided by 3, questioning the uniqueness of these remainders and how they relate to partitioning Z. There is discussion about equivalence classes and their properties in relation to the proof.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing guidance on the necessary steps to prove the partitioning. The conversation includes suggestions to define an equivalence relation and to demonstrate its properties, indicating a productive direction without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to show that every integer falls into one of the defined sets and that these sets are mutually exclusive. The discussion also touches on the requirements of the proof, including the properties of equivalence relations.

gotmilk04
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that Z can be partitioned as Z= 3Z [tex]\cup[/tex] (1+3Z) [tex]\cup[/tex] (2+3Z),
where m+3Z={m_3n| n[tex]\in Z[/tex]}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure how to start to prove this. I know it has to do with the remainder when an arbitrary integer is divided by 3, but I don't know how to proceed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When dividing [tex]n \in \textbf{Z}[/tex] by 3 and taking the remainders, what are the possible values?
 
You can get either 0, 1, or 2 as the remainder.
 
What would happen if n had remainder b and remainder c after being divided by 3 with b and c not equal?
 
How would that be possible without b and c being equal?
 
Can you show that it causes a contradiction? Another way to do it is to show that b and c are equal as you said.

There are two things that you need to prove and you already know how to do both of them. Do you know what they are?
 
I need to prove that when n is divided by 3 it has a unique remainder (0,1 or 2) and that these three groups make up all of Z, right?
 
correct.

put another way:

1) every integer is in one of the sets
2) every integer is in only one of the sets

what are some theorems you've learned that can help with 1?
 
Any pair of equivalence classes is either equal or disjoint
and equivalence classes form a partition of the set?
So if I show that there are three equivalence classes, that would prove it?
 
  • #10
Yeah that would do it. I didn't know if you knew equivalence classes or not.

So you could define an equivalence relation and show that it's transitive, reflexive and symmetric and then apply the theorem that you quoted. That's three things that you need to prove.

I'd just use the definition of division to establish the equivalence classes directly as that's only two things that need to be proved.

Either way though. One wouldn't be much harder than the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K