Proving 2^n>=(n+1)^2 by mathematical induction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the inequality \(2^n \geq (n+1)^2\) for natural numbers \(n\) using mathematical induction. The original poster has established a base case for \(n=6\) and is attempting to show that if the inequality holds for \(n=k\), it also holds for \(n=k+1\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to manipulate the inequality to apply the induction hypothesis correctly. There are questions about which side of the inequality to start with and how to approach the algebraic manipulation needed to reach the desired form.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the algebraic manipulation, suggesting different strategies for plugging in \(k+1\) into the inequality. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of the induction hypothesis and the necessary steps to prove the statement.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint regarding the base case, as the inequality does not hold for \(n<6\), which influences the discussion on the validity of the induction hypothesis.

morbius27
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello, In this problem I am trying to Determine the exact set of natural numbers n for which the inequality 2^n>=(n+1)^2 holds. (equation (1))

I have already dealt with the base case where n=6, (since the inequality does not hold for n<6), and so (1) holds for n=k, and I need to show that it holds for n=k+1. It's the algebra that I really can't figure out. I tried 2^(k+1)=2^k*2>=2*(k+1)^2 (by induction hypothesis).

I need to get this in the form 2^(k+1)>=((k+1)+1)^2, but I have no idea how to get to this point from here. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
morbius27 said:
2^(k+1)=2^k*2>=2*(k+1)^2 (by induction hypothesis).

Your induction hypothesis is wrong, you have to consider n=k+1 in both sides of the inequality that you have as the thesis, [tex]2^n\geq(n+1)^2[/tex], which is what you are looking for.
 
well I know you have to start with one side of the inequality by plugging in k+1 for n, and then manipulating it to the point where you can apply the induction hypothesis (2^n>=(n+1)^2) and then more manipulation to get to 2^(k+1)>=((k+1)+1)^2...I just don't know which side of the inequality to start with (2^(k+1) or ((k+1)+1)^2 and the necessary algebra to arrive at the conclusion.
 
I don't usually do as you say, but for me it is much easier to put k+1 in both therms and try one of two things, to get to a true expression where the initial inequation is evident, or to try to get to the induction hypothesis from the initial equation also.

In both of these ways I can always be sure to be getting the right thing because the initial inequation, that we assume as true, is always there.

Try this way, if you get stuck in the algebra just ask.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K