MHB Proving $2P(x)>P'(x)$ with Continuous Third Derivative of $P(x)$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality $2P(x) > P'(x)$ given that $P(x)$ has a continuous third derivative and that $P(x)$, $P'(x)$, $P''(x)$, and $P'''(x)$ are all positive for all $x$. It is established that if $P(x) > P'''(x)$ for all $x$, then this condition can be leveraged to demonstrate the desired inequality. The proposed solution involves analyzing the behavior of the derivatives and applying properties of continuous functions. The thread emphasizes the importance of the assumptions about the positivity and continuity of the derivatives in reaching the conclusion. Overall, the discussion aims to provide a rigorous proof of the stated inequality under the given conditions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $P$ be a real function with a continuous third derivative such that $P(x),\,P'(x),\,P''(x),\,P'''(x)$ are greater than zero for all $x$.

Suppose that $P(x)>P'''(x)$ for all $x$, prove that $2P(x)>P'(x)$ for all $x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solution proposed by other:

For simplicity, we will show $2P(0)>P'(0)$. Applying this result to $P(x+c)$ shows that $2P(c)>P'(c)$ for all $c$.

Since $P'(x)$ is positive, $P$ is an increasing function. Thus for $x\le 0$, $P'''(x)< P(x)\le P(0)$. Integrating $P'''(x)\le P(0)$ from $x$ to 0 gives $P''(x)\le P''(0)+P(0)x$ for $x\le 0$, and integrating again gives the second inequality in $0<P'(x)\le P'(0)+P''(0)x+P(0)\dfrac{x^2}{2}$. Thus the polynomial $P'(0)+P''(0)x+P(0)\dfrac{x^2}{2}$ has no negative zeros. It also has no nonnegative zeros (because all its coefficients are positive). Therefore its discriminant $P''(0)^2-2P(0)P'(0)$ must be negative.

In a similar vein, since $P'''$ is positive, $P''$ is increasing. Thus for $x\le 0$, $P''(x)\le P''(0)$, so $P'(x)\le P'(0)+P''(0)x$ and $0<P(x)\le P(0)+P'(0)x+P''(0)\dfrac{x^2}{2}$.

Again, the discriminant of the quadratic must be negative: $P'(0)^2-2P(0)P''(0)<0$.

Combining these conclusion, we obtain $P'(0)^4<4P(0)^2P''(0)^2<8P(0)^3P'(0)$, which implies $2P(x)>P'(x)$ for all $x$..
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top