Proving a+b+c=abc with Inverse Trig Functions

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 5K views
ebola_virus
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
a teacher wrote on the board

tan-1(a) + tan-1(b) + tan-1(c) = pi
[they are inverse trig functions btw, not the recipricol 1/tanx = cotx]

hence prove that

a + b + c = abc

wow. do you have any idea where i can start? thanks. I've been uttered clueless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should first find what
[tex]\tan^{-1} x + \tan^{-1} y[/tex] is.That is, can you find the (??) in the equation below?
[tex]\tan^{-1} x + \tan^{-1} y = \tan^{-1} (??)[/tex]
Finding the above is very interesting.
You have to consider the cases when

xy<1
xy>1 and x,y >0
xy>1 and x,y <0
 
Last edited:
where did x and y come from agn?
 
ebola_virus said:
a teacher wrote on the board
tan-1(a) + tan-1(b) + tan-1(c) = pi
[they are inverse trig functions btw, not the recipricol 1/tanx = cotx]
hence prove that
a + b + c = abc
wow. do you have any idea where i can start? thanks. I've been uttered clueless.

so you mean:
[tex] arctan(a) + arctan(b) + arctan(c) = \pi[/tex]
 
If the first statement is true then a, b and c can be represented by the interior angles of a triangle. There is no triangle for which [itex]a + b + c = a \cdot b \cdot c[/itex] because the maximum possible value of [itex]a \cdot b \cdot c[/itex] is [itex](\pi/3)^3[/itex] which is less than [itex]\pi[/itex].
 
Tide said:
If the first statement is true then a, b and c can be represented by the interior angles of a triangle. There is no triangle for which [itex]a + b + c = a \cdot b \cdot c[/itex] because the maximum possible value of [itex]a \cdot b \cdot c[/itex] is [itex](\pi/3)^3[/itex] which is less than [itex]\pi[/itex].

An example solution is:
[tex]a=b=c=\sqrt{3}[/tex]
so
[tex]\tan^{-1}(a)=\tan^{-1}(b)=\tan^{-1}(c)=\frac{\pi}{3}[/itex]<br /> Then<br /> [tex]abc=3 \sqrt{3}[/tex]<br /> and<br /> [tex]a+b+c= 3 \sqrt{3}[/tex][/tex]
 
er, i guess i got it

hehe i got it that makes more sort of. systematic sense.

using the double angle for tan thing

tan [a + b] = tan (a) + tan (b)
---------------
1 - tan(a)tan(b)

state that tan (a) = A
tan (b) = B you'll see why later.

anyways take the arctan of both sides of the double identity for tan and you get

a + b = arctan [tan (a) + tab (b) / 1 -tan(a)tan(b)]

now because tan (a) = A
a = arctan A and vice vresa for B

hence you end up wiht the arctan identity

arctan (A) + arctan (B) = arctan [(A+B)/(1-AB)]

and then you use that for a, b, and c you end up with the simple equation that tan pi = 0, hence

a + b + c - abc = 0
hence
a + b + c = abc

try that method. just for those of you who awanted a more systematic proof and that made more induction sort of sense. thanks again guys.