Proving A ⊆ B using Set Theory

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the set theory statement A ⊆ B is equivalent to A ∩ Bᶜ = ∅. Participants are exploring the implications of this equivalence and the logical steps involved in the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting points for the proof, with some suggesting to assume one side of the implication while others focus on the conditions of the intersection with the complement. There are attempts to clarify the implications of elements belonging to sets and their complements.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and suggesting directions for further exploration. Some have identified potential contradictions and are refining their arguments, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the proof process.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the definitions of set operations and the implications of elements being in a set versus its complement. Participants are also navigating the constraints of proving equivalences in set theory without reaching definitive conclusions.

glebovg
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
How would I prove [itex]A \subseteq B \Leftrightarrow A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex] ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is what I have so far:

Suppose [itex]A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex]. Let [itex]x \in A[/itex]. We want to show [itex]x \in B[/itex]. Since [itex]A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex] and [itex]x \in A[/itex] then [itex]x \notin B^{c}[/itex]. Hence [itex]x \in B[/itex].
 
Why not start by assuming either side of the two way implication, rather than assuming something completely different?
 
It is supposed to be [itex]A \subseteq B \Leftrightarrow A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex].
 
Ok, then what you've got is a good start. Now work it the other direction.
 
So ([itex]\Rightarrow[/itex]) is correct? First, I suppose [itex]A \subseteq B[/itex]. Then I let [itex]x \in A[/itex] and therefore [itex]x \in B[/itex] by supposition, but then it does not lead me anywhere.
 
Can something be in B and B complement?
 
[itex]\emptyset[/itex] ?
 
Also, we know [itex]\emptyset \subseteq A \cap B^{c}[/itex] and we want to show [itex]A \cap B^{c} \subseteq \emptyset[/itex], but I do not know how to do it.
 
  • #10
glebovg said:
[itex]\emptyset[/itex] ?

Can there be any element in B and B complement?
 
  • #11
No, that would be a contradiction.
 
  • #12
glebovg said:
No, that would be a contradiction.

The rest should follow. Can't think of another hint that isn't the complete answer.
 
  • #13
Is this correct?

Suppose [itex]A \subseteq B[/itex]. Let [itex]x \in A[/itex]. Then [itex]x \in B \because A \subseteq B[/itex]. [itex]A \cap B^{c} \Rightarrow x \in A[/itex] and [itex]x \in B^{c}[/itex] by definition of intersection. Since [itex]x \in B[/itex], [itex]A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex].
 
  • #14
Ok, but you can tighten up the the argument. If x in A, then x in B, then x not in B complement; then A intersect B complement is empty.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
5K