Proving a property of a Dedekind cut

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A Dedekind cut is defined as a pair (A, B) of nonempty subsets of rational numbers that satisfy specific properties. The discussion focuses on proving Property 5, which states that for each element a in A, there exists an element b greater than a in B. The proof is structured into two main cases: when b is less than or equal to 0 and when b squared is less than or equal to 2. The conclusion is that the proof holds, but it is suggested to clarify the conditions regarding the positivity of b and the cases for a.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dedekind cuts in real analysis
  • Familiarity with properties of rational numbers
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proof techniques
  • Concept of inequalities and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dedekind cuts in detail
  • Explore proofs related to real number completeness
  • Investigate the implications of rational number properties in analysis
  • Learn about different proof techniques in mathematical logic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the foundations of number theory and mathematical proofs.

Hall
Messages
351
Reaction score
87
Homework Statement
##A = \{x: x\lt 0 or x^2 \lt 2\}##
##B = \{x: x \gt 0 ~and~x^2 \gt 2\}##

Prove that ##(A,B)## is a Dedekind cut.
Relevant Equations
There are some properties which a cut must have.
A Dedekind cut is a pair ##(A,B)##, where ##A## and ##B## are both subsets of rationals. This pair has to satisfy the following properties
  1. A is nonempty
  2. B is nonempty
  3. If ##a\in A## and ##c \lt a## then ##c \in A##
  4. If ##b \in B## and ## c\gt b## then ##c \in B##
  5. If ##b \not\in B## and ## a\lt b##, then ##a \in A##
  6. If ##a \not\in A## and ##b \gt a##, then ##b \in B##
  7. For each ##a \in A## there is some ## b \gt a ## so that ##b \in A##
  8. For each ##b \in B## there is some ## a \lt b## so that ##a \in B##

For the given cut, I tried to prove Property 5. Here is my attempt:

If ## b \not \in B## then we have:

Case 1: ## b \leq 0##
Sub-Case (I): ##b=0##. If ##a \lt b \implies a \lt 0##, well then ##a \in A##.
Sub-Case (II): ##b \lt 0##. If ## a \lt b \implies b \lt 0##, again ## a \in A##

Case 2: ## b^2 \leq 2##
Sub-Case (I): ##b^2 = 2##. If ## a \lt b implies a^2 \lt b^2 = 2##, well then ## a \in A##
Sub-Case (II): ## b^2 \lt 2##. If ## a \lt b \implies a^2 \lt b^2 \lt 2##, again ## a \in A##

That proves Property 5.

Am I right? I had a hard time in understanding why would ##b \not\in B## and ##b \not\in A## when all ## a## and ##b## in th properties listed above has to be rational numbers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks ok to me except that your Case 2 hypothesis and proofs should specify that ##b## is positive and consider both positive and negative cases for ##a##. (In fact, maybe you should just change Case 1 to the case of ##a \le 0##.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K