Proving an Integral Problem: Kepler's Law Derivation Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrifidBlue
  • Start date Start date
TrifidBlue
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
How can this be proved?

intg.jpg


I really in need to know it, as I'm working on a derivation of Kepler's laws, but I'm stuck at this point :confused::cry::frown: ...
Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To solve the integral, I would have tried to complete the square in the denominator before using trig substitution. However, due to the fundamental theorem of calculus, you might find it easier to take the derivative of the right hand side. There does seem to be an arbitrary constant missing.
 
This can be solved with the Abel substitution
t=(\sqrt{a+bx+cx^2})'
 
I wonder what's the easiest way :) Maybe you calculate and tell me ;)
Hint: For the Abel substitution calculate 4t^2Y and rearrange for Y (Y=a+bx+cx^2). Then solve with usual trig substitution. This also works if the square root is any other half-integer power.

In general for simple square roots you can also use
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/EulersSubstitutionsForIntegration.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Case 1: b^2 - 4ac = 0 in which case the quadratic term is a perfect square of a linear term, so the integral is simply the log of that term.

Case 2: If b^2- 4ac > 0, then completing the square and a simple linear shift will make the integrand of the form \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 - a^2}}, and x= a cosh t makes that one come out immediately.

Case 3: If b^2-4ac < 0, completing the square and a linear shift makes the integrand of the form \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + a^2}}, and x= a sinh t makes that one come out immediately.

Of course the appropriate circular trigonometric substitutions would work as well, but don't come out as quickly. For both of these integrals, the substitutions lead straight to \int dt
 
thank you very much Tedjn, Gerenuk and Gib Z
and extra thanks for you Gib Z for the details
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top