Proving Banach Space Property Using Topological Isomorphism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a space F is a Banach space using the properties of topological isomorphisms and the fact that another space E is already known to be a Banach space. Participants are exploring the implications of Cauchy sequences and boundedness in the context of these spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between Cauchy sequences in spaces E and F, questioning whether starting with a Cauchy sequence in F is more appropriate. There are attempts to connect the boundedness of sequences and the properties of isomorphisms to establish convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering hints and questioning the assumptions made about the sequences. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to show convergence of Cauchy sequences in F, and the relevance of the isomorphism between the spaces is being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted assumption that E is a Banach space, which influences the reasoning about Cauchy sequences. Participants are navigating the implications of this assumption while trying to establish the properties of F.

dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/2512/60637341vi6.png

Homework Equations


I think this is relevant:
http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/336/51636887dc4.png

The Attempt at a Solution


A topological isomorphism implies that T and T-1 are bounded and given is that all cauchy sequences in E are convergent.

But if that's the case then by boundedness all convergent sequences are bounded in het norm of F and are thus also Cauchy seqeunces. Am I thinking in the right direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
dirk_mec1 said:
But if that's the case then by boundedness all convergent sequences are bounded in het norm of F and are thus also Cauchy seqeunces. Am I thinking in the right direction?
You have to prove that every Cauchy sequence in F converges. How is what you're saying doing that?
 
Okay so that's wrong but suppose I have a cauchy sequence in E: |x_n-x_m|_E < \epsilon\ , \forall n,m\geq N how can I prove then that F is also Banach?
 
Why are you taking a cauchy sequence in E? You're supposed to prove that F is a Banach space.
 
morphism said:
Why are you taking a cauchy sequence in E? You're supposed to prove that F is a Banach space.

Because it is given that E is Banach what implies that every cauchy sequence converges.
 
What I meant is that it makes more sense to start with a cauchy sequence in F rather than in E. Because you want to prove that every cauchy sequence in F converges.
 
Can someone give me a hint? Because I've started with a cauchy sequence in F but I honestly do not see what to do next.
 
Let {an} be a sequence in F. What can you say about {T-1 an}?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Let {an} be a sequence in F. What can you say about {T-1 an}?


Let \{ a_n \} be a sequence in F then for all n,m \geq N we have:


|| T^{-1} (a_n-a_m)||_E \leq c\cdot ||a_n-a_m||_F < c \cdot \epsilon

So an is Cauchy in F.

But how do I get it to converge in F with limit a?
 
  • #10
Look, you want to show that F is a Banach space. So you take an arbitrary cauchy sequence in F and show that it converges in F. What do we have to work with here? We know that F is isomorphic to a Banach space. Use that isomorphism.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K