Proving Conjecture: No Real Solutions Greater than 2 for Polynomial Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter FeDeX_LaTeX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture
FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

I don't know how to prove this conjecture I've made;

For the polynomial equation

-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}k^{n}=0

there exist no real solutions greater than 2, no matter how large the value of n.

How do I show that this is true?

If it's a little unclear, what I mean is, for example, if you had the equation

k^30 - k^29 - k^28 ... - k - 1 = 0, k doesn't exceed 2.

So even if you start from 1000, or 100000000000, or any number, you will never find a solution greater than 2.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am assuming your latex equation has something missing, because otherwise the minus sign at the start doesn't have any purpose. So working from your example equation:

k^n - k^{n-1} - k^{n-2} \cdots - k - 1 = 0

Multiply by k:

k^{n+1} - k^{n} - k^{n-1} \cdots - k^2 - k = 0

Subtract the first equation from the second:

k^{n+1} - 2k^n + 1 = 0

k^n(k-2) + 1 = 0

Which has no solution if k > 2
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top