Proving Continuity: When Does a Continuous Function Equal Zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a continuous function g, which equals zero on a dense subset A of real numbers, must equal zero everywhere on the real line. The proof utilizes the definition of continuity and the properties of dense sets, demonstrating that if g were positive or negative at any point outside A, it would lead to a contradiction. The conclusion is that g(x) = 0 for all x in R, confirming the theorem's validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of dense subsets in real analysis
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Experience with proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of dense subsets in more depth
  • Explore the implications of continuity in real-valued functions
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of continuity
  • Investigate other proofs involving continuity and dense sets in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching continuity and dense sets, and anyone interested in formal proof techniques in mathematical analysis.

JG89
Messages
724
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A subset of [tex]A \subseteq R[/tex] of real numbers is called dense if [tex]\forall \delta > 0 , \forall x \in R , \exists a \in A: |x-a| < \delta[/tex] .

Suppose [tex]A \subseteq R[/tex] is dense. Prove that if g is a continuous function with g(x) = 0 for all [tex]x \in A[/tex], then g = 0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



From the continuity of g, we know that [tex]\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists \delta > 0 : |g(x) - g(x_0)| < \epsilon[/tex] whenever [tex]0 < |x-x_0| < \delta[/tex]. Now let x_0 be any real number that is not an element of A. We must prove that g(x_0) = 0.

To argue by contradiction, first assume that g(x_0) > 0. Again from g's continuity, [tex]\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists \delta > 0 : g(x_0) - \epsilon < g(x) < g(x_0) + \epsilon[/tex] whenever [tex]0 < |x-x_0| < \delta[/tex]. Putting [tex]\epsilon = g(x_0)/2[/tex], we have [tex]g(x_0) - g(x_0)/2 = g(x_0)/2 < g(x)[/tex]. Now g(x_0)/2 is positive and as a consequence, for all x in the interval [tex]x_0 - \delta < x < x_0 + \delta[/tex], g(x) > 0.

Since A is dense, then we can find a value x = x* in our delta-interval that is an element of A. We know that g(x*) = 0, but from our assumption that g(x) > 0 we've proved that g(x*) > 0, and so this is a contradiction.

The proof for assuming g(x) < 0 is similar, and so g(x) = 0 for all x. QED

How does this proof look?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks just fine to me.
 
Thanks for checking :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K