Proving |det(1+A)|^2 >=1 by Diagonalizing iA: Linear Algebra Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an anti-Hermitian matrix A and requires proving that |det(1+A)|^2 >= 1 by diagonalizing the matrix iA, which is Hermitian. The discussion centers around the properties of these matrices and their determinants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the diagonalization of iA and its implications, questioning the necessity of this step. There is exploration of the relationship between the eigenvalues of iA and the determinant of (1+A).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and questioning specific steps in their reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of determinants and the implications of the eigenvalues being real.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the validity of certain equalities in the transformations being discussed, particularly concerning the eigenvalues of the diagonal matrix D. The discussion also reflects on the constraints of the problem, such as the requirement to show a specific inequality without providing a complete solution.

N00813
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A is an anti-Hermitian matrix.
Show, by diagonalising iA, that:

|det(1+A)|^2 >=1

Homework Equations



A^H denotes hermitian conjugate of A; A^H = -A\

x = Ox' transforms vector components between 2 basis sets.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that iA is a Hermitian matrix, so it is diagonalisable.
But I'm not sure what the point of diagonalising iA is.

D = O^(-1)(iA)O
for diagonal matrix of eigenvalues D.

det(iA) = det(D).

I'm floundering around. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
N00813 said:

Homework Statement


A is an anti-Hermitian matrix.
Show, by diagonalising iA, that:

|det(1+A)|^2 >=1

Homework Equations



A^H denotes hermitian conjugate of A; A^H = -A\

x = Ox' transforms vector components between 2 basis sets.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that iA is a Hermitian matrix, so it is diagonalisable.
But I'm not sure what the point of diagonalising iA is.

D = O^(-1)(iA)O
for diagonal matrix of eigenvalues D.

Therefore A = O(-iD)O^{-1}.

Also the eigenvalues of iA (and hence the entries of D) are real.

Hint:
O^{-1}(I + A)^2O = O^{-1}(I + 2A + A^2)O \\<br /> = O^{-1}(I + 2A + AOO^{-1}A)O
and
<br /> \det(O^{-1}(I + A)^2O) = \det ((I + A)^2)<br />
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
pasmith said:
Therefore A = O(-iD)O^{-1}.

Also the eigenvalues of iA (and hence the entries of D) are real.

Hint:
O^{-1}(I + A)^2O = O^{-1}(I + 2A + A^2)O \\<br /> = O^{-1}(I + 2A + AOO^{-1}A)O
and
<br /> \det(O^{-1}(I + A)^2O) = \det ((I + A)^2)<br />
I suppose the first equality equals:

O^{-1}(I + 2A + AOO^{-1}A)O = (I - 2iD - D^2)

(This is the bit I'm a bit wonky on, particularly the 3rd equality. Is that part correct?)
Then |\det((I + A)^2)| = |\det(I - 2iD - D^2)| = |\det((I-iD)^2)|=|\det(I^2 + D^2)| &gt;= det(I^2) = 1
where
 
Last edited:
N00813 said:
I suppose the first equality equals:

O^{-1}(I + 2A + AOO^{-1}A)O = (I - 2iD - D^2)

(This is the bit I'm a bit wonky on, particularly the 3rd equality. Is that part correct?)
Then |\det((I + A)^2)| = |\det(I - 2iD - D^2)| = |\det((I-iD)^2)|=|\det(I^2 + D^2)| \geq 1

If you're not sure that the third equality holds (and it holds only if the eigenvalues of D are real), you should prove it. This will require calculating the quantity you are asked to show is at least 1, at which point you have answered the question.
 
Last edited:
pasmith said:
If you're not sure that the third equality holds (and it holds only if the eigenvalues of D are real), you should prove it. This will require calculating the quantity you are asked to show is at least 1, at which point you have answered the question.

I suppose, if the action of the complex conjugate is to change the sign of the i:
|\det((I-iD)^2)| = \det((I-iD) (\det(I-iD))^* = \det(I-iD)\det(I+iD)

I suppose I can prove (\det(I-iD))^* = \det(I+iD) using suffix notation definition for the determinant.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K