Proving Differentiability of f in R$^2$

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiability
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the differentiability of the function f defined in R^2, specifically at the point (0,0). Part a requires demonstrating that the partial derivatives of f are bounded, while part b involves showing that the directional derivative exists and is bounded by 1. For part c, the user seeks assistance in proving the differentiability of the function g(t) = f(γ(t)), where γ is a differentiable mapping from R^1 to R^2. It is noted that parts a and b are not necessary to solve part c, and the approach involves substituting γ(t) into f and differentiating, particularly at t = 0. The main challenge lies in handling the derivative at this specific point.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
Define f(0,0) = 0 and

f(x,y) = \frac {x^3}{x^2 + y^2} if (x,y) \neq (0,0)

a) Prove that the partial derivatives of f are bounded functions in R^2.

b) Let \mathbf{u} be any unit vector in R^2. Show that the directional derivative (D_{\mathbf{u}} f)(0,0) exists, and its absolute value is at most 1.

c)Let \gamma be a differentiable mapping of R^1 into R^2, with \gamma(0) = (0,0) and |\gamma'(0)| > 0. Put g(t) = f(\gamma(t)) and prove that g is differentiable for every t \in R^1.

I can do parts a) and b). I need help with part c) at t = 0. I am not sure if I need parts a) and b) for part c).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start off with \gamma (t) = \gamma_1 (t)\mathbf{e_1}+\gamma_2 (t)\mathbf{e_2} and substitute this into f(x,y) and take a derivative (deal with t=0 separately). You do not need parts a and b for part c.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K