Proving/Disproving Equicontinuity of F_n(x) = sin nx

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Amer
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sin
In summary, we have proven that the family F_n(x) = sin nx is not equicontinuous by showing that there exists an epsilon value for which the given definition of equicontinuity does not hold. Similarly, we can also prove that the family F_n(x) = cos nx is not equicontinuous by choosing an appropriate n and x, which results in a contradiction to the definition. Therefore, we can conclude that neither of these families is equicontinuous.
  • #1
Amer
259
0
Prove or disprove
[tex]F_n(x) = sin nx [/tex] is equicontinuous

I know the definition of equicontinuous at [tex]x_0[/tex] it says for all [tex]\epsilon >0 [/tex] there exist [tex]\delta>0 [/tex] such that if [tex]d ( f(x_0),f(x) ) < \epsilon [/tex] then
[tex]d(x_0 , x) < \delta [/tex]

trying if it is equicontinuous at [tex]x_0 = 0 [/tex]
Given [tex]\epsilon > 0 [/tex]

[tex]| f(x) | < \epsilon \Rightarrow |\sin n x | < \epsilon [/tex]
delta depends on epsilon and x just how i can continue

any hints or any directions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Amer said:
Prove or disprove
[tex]F_n(x) = \sin nx [/tex] is equicontinuous

I know the definition of equicontinuous at [tex]x_0[/tex] it says for all [tex]\epsilon >0 [/tex] there exist [tex]\delta>0 [/tex] such that if [tex]d ( f(x_0),f(x) ) < \epsilon [/tex] then
[tex]d(x_0 , x) < \delta [/tex]

trying if it is equicontinuous at [tex]x_0 = 0 [/tex]
Given [tex]\epsilon > 0 [/tex]

[tex]| f(x) | < \epsilon \Rightarrow |\sin n x | < \epsilon [/tex]
delta depends on epsilon and x just how i can continue

any hints or any directions
You have written the definition of equicontinuity the wrong way round. It should say that the family $\{f_n(x)\}$ is equicontinuous if for all [tex]\epsilon >0 [/tex] there exists [tex]\delta>0 [/tex] such that if [tex]d(x_0 , x) < \delta [/tex] then [tex]d ( f(x_0),f(x) ) < \epsilon .[/tex]

If the family $\{\sin nx\}$ is equicontinuous, then the definition of equicontinuity should hold with $\epsilon = 1/2.$ Thus there should exist $\delta>0$ such that if $|x|<\delta$ then $|\sin nx < \epsilon$ for all $n.$ Now choose $n$ so that $\frac{\pi}{2n}<\delta$ and let $x = \frac{\pi}{2n}.$ Then $|x|<\delta$ but $|\sin nx| = 1$, contradicting the definition. Thus the family cannot be equicontinuous.
 
  • #3
Opalg said:
You have written the definition of equicontinuity the wrong way round. It should say that the family $\{f_n(x)\}$ is equicontinuous if for all [tex]\epsilon >0 [/tex] there exists [tex]\delta>0 [/tex] such that if [tex]d(x_0 , x) < \delta [/tex] then [tex]d ( f(x_0),f(x) ) < \epsilon .[/tex]
Should be "... then for all n, [tex]d ( f_n(x_0),f_n(x) ) < \epsilon[/tex]."
 
  • #4
Thanks very much Opalg,
 
Last edited:
  • #5
at the same way i can prove that the family [tex]F_n (x) = \cos nx [/tex] is not equicontinuous

Suppose that [tex]F_n [/tex] is equicontinuous at x=0 so for any [tex]\epsilon < 1 [/tex] there exist [tex]\delta >0 [/tex] such that if [tex]|x| < \delta [/tex] then [tex] |\cos nx - 1 | < \epsilon [/tex]
choose n so that [tex] \frac{\pi}{2n } < \delta [/tex] let [tex]x = \frac{\pi}{2n} [/tex]
[tex]|\cos n\left(\frac{\pi}{2n} \right) - 1 | = |1| = 1 > \epsilon [/tex]
Is it Ok
Thank you again (Smile)
 

What is equicontinuity?

Equicontinuity is a property of a set of functions where all the functions in the set have the same continuity behavior at every point. In other words, for any given point, the functions in the set do not vary significantly in their values.

How do you prove equicontinuity of a set of functions?

To prove equicontinuity of a set of functions, you need to show that for any given point, the functions in the set do not vary significantly in their values. This can be done by using the definition of continuity, which states that a function is continuous at a point if the limit of the function at that point is equal to the function's value at that point.

What is the significance of proving equicontinuity?

Proving equicontinuity is important because it helps us understand the behavior of a set of functions. Equicontinuity ensures that the functions in the set do not vary significantly, which can be useful in many applications, such as optimization and approximation.

How do you disprove equicontinuity of a set of functions?

To disprove equicontinuity, you need to find a point where the functions in the set vary significantly in their values. This can be done by finding a point where the limit of the functions at that point is not equal to the function's value at that point, thus violating the definition of continuity.

How does equicontinuity relate to the function F_n(x) = sin nx?

Equicontinuity does not necessarily relate to the function F_n(x) = sin nx. It depends on the set of functions that the function F_n(x) belongs to. If the set of functions is equicontinuous, then F_n(x) = sin nx will also be equicontinuous. However, if the set of functions is not equicontinuous, then F_n(x) = sin nx will not be equicontinuous.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
11
Views
954
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
284
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top