Proving Divisibility by 6 Using Mathematical Induction

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around proving that the expression n(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 6 for any integer n using mathematical induction. Participants explore various approaches to formalize the induction process and address concerns about the validity of certain steps in the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a base case for n = 1 and assumes the inductive step for n = k, but seeks guidance on formalizing the proof from that point.
  • Another participant suggests representing the statement as n(n + 1)(n + 2) = 6k and proposes a specific form for the induction step involving summation.
  • A participant questions the necessity of a theoretical approach to demonstrate that 3(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 6.
  • Another participant proposes using the summation formula as an alternative method to prove the divisibility.
  • There is a suggestion of using double induction, though it is not elaborated upon.
  • One participant provides a breakdown of cases based on whether n is even or odd, showing how to derive the divisibility condition in both scenarios.
  • A later reply introduces a combinatorial perspective, expressing 3(n + 1)(n + 2) in terms of binomial coefficients, suggesting a connection to the summation method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to prove the divisibility, with some advocating for theoretical methods while others prefer case-based reasoning. There is no consensus on a single method or the necessity of a specific theoretical framework.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity on the assumptions made in the proof and the validity of the steps taken, indicating that the discussion may benefit from further exploration of these aspects.

Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Prove that n(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 6 for any integer n

What I have done so far:

For n = 1
1(1 + 1)(1 + 2) = 1(2)(3) = 6(1) = 6
6 is divisible by 6 (TRUE)

For n = k
k(k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible 6 (ASSUMED AS TRUE)

For n = k + 1
(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) = k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 3(k + 1)(k + 2)

What am I supposed to do from here onward?

Yes, I know that:
k(k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible by 6
(k + 1) and (k + 2) are subsequent numbers so that its product is even or divisible by 2. Because (k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible by 2 then 3(k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible by 6.
Because k(k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible by 6 and 3(k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible by 6 then k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 3(k + 1)(k + 2) is divisible by 6 (PROVEN TRUE)

However, I am not sure if that follows the standard procedure of mathematical induction. Can someone please show me the "proper" "formal" way using mathematical induction continued from the bolded part?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I would give $P_n$ as:

$$n(n+1)(n+2)=6k$$ where $$k\in\mathbb{N}$$

Now, as your induction step, I would look at adding:

$$(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)-n(n+1)(n+2)=3(n+1)(n+2)=6\sum_{j=1}^{n+1}(j)$$

to $P_n$.
 
How can we be sure that 3(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 6 without the "theory" approach I wrote in my initial post?
 
Monoxdifly said:
How can we be sure that 3(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 6 without the "theory" approach I wrote in my initial post?

By using the summation formula instead. Or, you could prove that $n(n+1)$ is even by induction...:)
 
Means we have to use double induction?
 
Monoxdifly said:
How can we be sure that 3(n + 1)(n + 2) is divisible by 6 without the "theory" approach I wrote in my initial post?
Either $n$ is even or $n$ is odd. If $n$ is even, let $n=2k$ then we have $3(n+1)(n+2) = 6(k+1)(2k+1)$. If $n$ is odd then let $n=2k+1$ which gives $6(k+1)(2k+3)$.
 
June29 said:
Either $n$ is even or $n$ is odd. If $n$ is even, let $n=2k$ then we have $3(n+1)(n+2) = 6(k+1)(2k+1)$. If $n$ is odd then let $n=2k+1$ which gives $6(k+1)(2k+3)$.

That's likely the most straightforward way to proceed. (Yes)
 
I also like $\displaystyle 3(n+1)(n+2) = 6 \binom{n+2}{2}$, which in a sense is your summation method in disguise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K