Proving Equality of Definite Integrals with Trigonometric Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two definite integrals involving trigonometric functions, specifically the relation \(\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^m 2x \, dx = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^m x \, dx\) for any integer \(m\). Participants explore various substitution techniques and trigonometric identities to establish this equality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using substitutions to relate sine and cosine functions, with one suggesting the use of the Pythagorean identity. There are inquiries about how to convert sine into cosine and the implications of specific substitutions, such as \(2x = \frac{\pi}{2} - u\).

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and suggestions for substitutions. Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches, while others affirm the validity of the reasoning presented. There is an acknowledgment of implicit elements in the proof process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem, including the introduction of hypergeometric functions and the need for careful manipulation of trigonometric identities. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to navigate these challenges without reaching a definitive conclusion.

AndersCarlos
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been solving a problem, the solution is complete, however, I must prove that the following relation is true:

[tex]\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} sin^m 2x dx = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} cos^m x dx[/tex]
for any m.

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I've trying to find some kind of solution by using substitution, however, when I computed both integrals in indefinite form on WolframAlpha, to see if I was following the right path, it showed me an answer that contained a "hypergeometric function", which I haven't learned yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try a suitable subsitution. How can you make a sine into a cosine??
 
micromass:

Using the Pythagorean trigonometric identity.
Well, this would become (if I take the positive root): [tex]sin^m 2x = (1-cos^2 2x)^{\frac{m}{2}}[/tex]

I'm trying 'u' = cos x this time.
 
What is

[tex]\sin(\frac{\pi}{2}-x)[/tex]

??
 
micromass:

cos x
 
AndersCarlos, this is more of the same based on what we discussed yesterday.

Micromass has given you a very big hint. Try to convert [itex]\sin 2x[/itex] into [itex]\cos u[/itex]. What substitution would do that? (Note that your sub must also convert that double angle into a single angle). Hint: There's a [itex]\frac{\pi}{4}[/itex] somewhere in there.

After that, there's more of that "even function" manipulation we were talking about yesterday.
 
Last edited:
micromass and Curious3141:

Well, I chose that: 2x = π/2 - u
then, dx = -du/2
[tex]\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} sin^m (2x)dx = - \int_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{-\pi}{2}} \frac{sin^m (\frac{\pi}{2} - u)}{2}du = \int_{\frac{-\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{cos^m (u)}{2} du = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} cos^m (u) du = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} cos^m (x) dx[/tex]

Well, I didn't see any π/4 during the process, but if there is anything wrong with this proof, sorry because I wrote it quite fast. Thank you both for your help.

Edit: I have forgotten to put the 'm' exponent through the process, just fixed it.
 
Last edited:
Looks good !
 
AndersCarlos said:
micromass and Curious3141:

Well, I chose that: 2x = π/2 - u
then, dx = -du/2
[tex]\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} sin^m (2x)dx = - \int_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{-\pi}{2}} \frac{sin^m (\frac{\pi}{2} - u)}{2}du = \int_{\frac{-\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{cos^m (u)}{2} du = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} cos^m (u) du = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} cos^m (x) dx[/tex]

Well, I didn't see any π/4 during the process, but if there is anything wrong with this proof, sorry because I wrote it quite fast. Thank you both for your help.

Edit: I have forgotten to put the 'm' exponent through the process, just fixed it.

Well, the pi/4 is implicit in your proof. What's x in terms of u? :wink:

Anyway, good job.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K