Proving f(x)>0 if x>0 with Function Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a function f, satisfying the conditions f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y) and f(xy)=f(x)f(y), is positive for all positive x. Initial findings indicate that f(x) equals x for rational numbers and that f is an odd function. The proof attempts to show contradictions arising from assuming f(x) could be negative for positive irrational x, but the logic is questioned regarding the treatment of irrational numbers. Suggestions include simplifying the proof by expressing positive x as a square and exploring the implications of f(a)^2 and the multiplicative properties of f. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in reasoning and a more straightforward approach to completing the proof.
jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50

Homework Statement



Prove that if f is the function which is not always zero, that satisfies f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y) and f(xy)=f(x)f(y), we have that f(x)>0 if x>0

Homework Equations



So far I've managed to prove that f(x)=x if x \in \mathbb{Q} and that f must be odd.

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose not, then if x > 0 and irrational we have that f(-x) > 0 > f(x). Since any rational number b > 0 can be expressed as the sum of two irrational numbers - x + (b-x) for instance - we have that b = x + y > 0 where x,y are irrational. This implies that,

b = f(b) = f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) > 0

Clearly, both x,y cannot be negative since this would imply that x+y < 0 a contradiction. We also have x,y cannot both be positive since this would imply that f(x)+f(y)<0 another contradiction.

I'm not positive that any of this is correct (probably isn't) and I would appreciate any corrections along with suggestions on how to complete the proof. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jgens! :smile:

Hints: what is f(√x)?

If f(y) = 0, what is f(x/y)?
 
I can't really follow your logic in 3). You first assume we have one positive irrational number x which is a counterexample to the problem statement. You then choose an arbitrary positive rational number b, and consider the irrational number y=b-x (about which you know very little). You say that x, y can't both be negative which is correct (since b is positive and also since by definition x > 0 so that can't be negative), but I don't see why we couldn't have y < 0 < x. x+y could still be positive if the absolute value of x is greater than that of y, and while f(x) < 0 you don't necessarily know that f(y) < 0 (remember you only assumed that there was a contradiction at one point x, not at all irrational points).

I think you're over complicating the problem slightly. If x > 0 we can write it as x = a^2 for some a > 0. We then have:
f(x) = f(aa) = f(a)^2
Also note that if a \not = 0 then a has a multiplicative inverse so:
1 = f(1) = f(a)f(1/a)
Try to see if you can show f(x) > 0 from this. You don't need a complete formula for f(x).
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top