Proving f(x) > e^x for a Monotonic Function with f'(x) > f(x) and f(0) = 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter talolard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a function \( f \) defined on the real numbers, which satisfies the conditions \( f'(x) > f(x) \) and \( f(0) = 1 \), is greater than \( e^x \) for all \( x > 0 \). The participants are exploring the implications of these conditions and the behavior of the function in relation to the exponential function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss defining a new function \( h(x) = f(x) - e^x \) and analyze its derivative to determine monotonicity. There is also a suggestion to consider a different function \( g(x) = \frac{f(x)}{e^x} \) to show that it is increasing, which may simplify the proof.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and suggesting alternative approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the justification of limits and the use of derivatives, indicating a productive exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There was a correction regarding the initial condition of the function, clarifying that \( f(0) = 1 \) rather than \( f(0) = 0 \). This correction is relevant to the discussion of the function's behavior at \( x = 0 \).

talolard
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f be a function from R to R such that [tex]f'(x)>f(x), f(0)=1[/tex] for every x. prove that for every [tex]x>0 f(x)>e^x[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


From the given information we know that [tex]f'(0) \geq 0[/tex] and so [tex]f'(x) \geq 0[/tex]

define [tex]h(x) = f(x)-e^x[/tex]
so h(0) =0

[tex]h'(x)=f'(x) -e^x = lim_{h ->0 } \frac {f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} -e^x= lim_{h ->0 } \frac {f(x+h)-f(x) -he^x}{h}= lim_{h ->0 } \frac {f(x+h)-f(x) -0}{h} = f'(x) \geq 0[/tex]

Then h(x) is montonous rising and so is never smaller then zero. thus [tex]f(x) \geq e^x[/tex]Is this correct?

Thanks
Tal
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you seemed to have defined f(0) = 0, so that h(0) = -1...
 
oops. I made a typo, that was supposed to be f(0)=1. Fixed in the original post.
Thanks
 
OK cool. Even though you have the right idea, the second to last equality in your main derivation cannot be justified, since you are taking the limit of some term in the numerator of a quotient which is a serious violation of the limit laws (basically you need to know all limits in the the numerator and denominator exist before you can perform such operations).

My advice would be to consider g(x) = f(x)/e^x instead and show g is increasing. At no point should you need to resort to the definition of the derivative.
 
That seems much simpler:
Just to make sure i got it right:
h(x) = [tex]\frac {f(x)}{e^x}, h(0)=1[/tex]
[tex]h'(x)= \frac {f'(x)e^x -f(x)e^x}{e^(2x)} \geq 0[/tex] because f'(x)>f(x)
Thanks
Tal
 
That's fine. Notice the last inequality is in fact strict, which only helps you I guess.
 
Thanks a lot. Much apreciated
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K