Proving ƒ(x) is the Identity Function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a polynomial function ƒ with real coefficients, which satisfies the condition ƒ(g(x)) = g(ƒ(x)) for all polynomial functions g, is the identity function. A proof by contradiction is presented, showing that if ƒ(c) ≠ c for some c, a contradiction arises when considering a polynomial k(x) with a zero at c but not at ƒ(c). The proof concludes that ƒ must equal the identity function, as any deviation leads to inconsistencies. Some participants suggest that the proof could be simplified by using a direct approach rather than contradiction. The key takeaway is that the identity function is the only polynomial satisfying the given condition.
Derek Hart
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have been going through a textbook trying to solve some of of these with somewhat formal proofs. This is a former Putnam exam question. (Seemingly the easiest one I have attempted, which worries me).

Consider a polynomial function ƒ with real coefficients having the property ƒ(g(x)) = g(ƒ(x)) for all polynomial functions g with real coefficients. Determine and prove the nature of ƒ.

Homework Equations


No equations, just the tricky fact that constant functions are polynomials.

The Attempt at a Solution


A proof by contradiction that ƒ(x) is the identity function:

We can consider the function h(x) = 1 and its derivative, which I will denote as g, namely to state the fact that ƒ((g+h)(x)) = ƒ(1) = g(ƒ(x)) + h(ƒ(x)), which then = ƒ(0) + ƒ(1); therefore ƒ(0) = 0.
Now, suppose that ƒ is not the identity function, or, specifically, that ƒ(c) ≠ c. We can consider the polynomial function k(x) which has a zero at c but not at ƒ(c). Then ƒ(k(c)) = ƒ(0) = 0 ≠ k(ƒ(c)); a contradiction occurs. This proves that ƒ must be the identity function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Derek Hart said:

The Attempt at a Solution


A proof by contradiction that ƒ(x) is the identity function:

We can consider the function h(x) = 1 and its derivative, which I will denote as g, namely to state the fact that ƒ((g+h)(x)) = ƒ(1) = g(ƒ(x)) + h(ƒ(x)), which then = ƒ(0) + ƒ(1); therefore ƒ(0) = 0.
Now, suppose that ƒ is not the identity function, or, specifically, that ƒ(c) ≠ c. We can consider the polynomial function k(x) which has a zero at c but not at ƒ(c). Then ƒ(k(c)) = ƒ(0) = 0 ≠ k(ƒ(c)); a contradiction occurs. This proves that ƒ must be the identity function.

I can't see what you are doing in the first part. There is a very simple way to show that ##f(0) = 0##.

The second part is sound. Although, this could be simplified by doing a straight proof, as opposed to using contradiction.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K